The Aspen Institute
The Aspen Institute is a global nonprofit founded in 1949 that works toward a free, just, and equitable society through dialogue, leadership, and action on challenges facing the United States and the world.
“Speak Up, Sit Out, Cool Down” Targets Youth Heat Illness
Laura Schifter of the Aspen Institute argues that protecting young athletes from extreme heat requires more than telling them to hydrate: children need permission and a simple script to stop playing when symptoms emerge. The institute’s Play It Cool campaign promotes “Speak Up, Sit Out, Cool Down” as a shared response to dizziness, nausea, headaches and cramps, with active cooling such as cold towels or ice packs after leaving the field. Schifter says the aim is to make stepping out of play a normal safety decision rather than a failure to push through.
Climate Action Needs a Moral Language Beyond Partisan Identity
Rainn Wilson argues that climate action needs more than science, policy and consumer-level guilt: it needs messages that reach the politically disengaged “movable middle” and a moral language rooted in care for people and the natural world. In conversation with Zeenat Rahman, he contends that treating places, relationships and ecosystems as sacred can give people with different politics or beliefs a shared basis for protecting them.
Lower-Income Countries Need Energy Abundance, Not Basic Grid Connections
Jason Bordoff and Cassady Walters argue that development policy should aim beyond basic electricity access toward “universal energy abundance”: reliable, affordable power sufficient to support industry, transport, agriculture and modern services. Through the High Level Panel on Universal Energy Abundance, they advocate country-specific energy pathways that account for climate constraints while addressing the financing, institutional and investment risks that make energy projects far costlier in lower-income markets.
Energy Shocks Are Accelerating Clean Power and Extending Coal Use
Former U.S. energy secretary Ernest Moniz argues that the Iran war and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz have strengthened the strategic case for low-carbon energy while also pushing price-constrained countries from gas to coal. In conversation with TIME’s Justin Worland, he says energy security, affordability and climate policy cannot be separated: electrification and clean power can reduce exposure to imported fuels, but most global energy use still depends on fuels without affordable, scalable low-carbon substitutes. Moniz expects the world to reach a lower-carbon system eventually, but by a slower and more uneven path.
Trust Is Built When Community Input Changes Decisions
Valerie Jarrett of the Obama Foundation and Allstate chief executive Tom Wilson argue that trust is built through local work that gives people real influence and a reason to cooperate, not through appeals for consensus. Jarrett says community engagement must alter institutions’ decisions, drawing on the Obama Presidential Center’s development on Chicago’s South Side; Wilson argues that people can work together on recovery and resilience even when they disagree about climate change. Both frame durable policy and civic action as the product of relationships, reciprocity and repeated shared obligations.
Battery Chemistry Now Sets Storage Cost, Safety, and Scale
Battery researcher Chibueze Amanchukwu argues that lithium-ion’s roughly 99% cost decline has made batteries core infrastructure for electric vehicles, grid-scale renewable integration and industrial electrification, but that no single chemistry resolves every constraint. In his account, cathode choices such as nickel-based NMC and NCA or lower-cost, more thermally stable LFP determine much of a cell’s cost, performance and fire risk. The next generation, he says, will be defined less by a wholesale replacement for lithium-ion than by chemistries designed around specific limits in materials, safety, energy density and scale.
Flood Resilience Depends on Building Capacity for Excess Water
Sarah Kapnick, a former NOAA chief scientist now advising clients at a bank, argues that companies and cities must stop treating historical weather data as a reliable guide to climate risk. As extreme rainfall and flooding outgrow infrastructure built for past conditions, she says resilience requires updated probability assumptions, added water-storage capacity, community-level planning and financing arranged before disaster forces improvised decisions.
Stopping Carbon Dioxide Emissions Can Stabilize Global Temperatures
Climate scientist Kate Marvel argues that climate models are conditional accounts of human choices, not predictions of an inevitable future: continued greenhouse-gas emissions produce a hotter, more dangerous world, while stopping carbon dioxide emissions can stabilize warming. Drawing on her work and her book *Human Nature*, Marvel also rejects the idea that scientific rigor requires emotional detachment, arguing that facts and feelings both belong in communicating what is at stake on Earth—the “only good planet.”
Transmission Permitting Is the Bottleneck to U.S. Electrification
Elisabeth Moyer argues that the U.S. power system’s central challenge is no longer simply replacing coal with cheaper wind and solar, but building the transmission needed to connect new generation with rapidly growing demand. Electricity use is rising after decades of stagnation, while variable renewable output, limited storage and slow permitting leave grid operators relying more often on costly plants. In her account, decarbonization depends on electrifying more of the economy—and on whether the country can expand a grid built for a different era.
Climate Damages Will Concentrate Among Populations Least Able to Adapt
Climate economist Amir Jina argues that the damage from warming cannot be read from global temperature averages alone: health, crops, labor and energy use respond non-linearly, with harms rising sharply once local thresholds are crossed. His evidence suggests that already hot, lower-income populations face the largest losses because they are closer to dangerous heat and have less access to cooling, resilient infrastructure and other forms of adaptation. While adaptation can reduce those effects, Jina says it remains incomplete and unevenly available.
Schools and Leagues Need Clear Heat and Smoke Stop-Play Rules
Extreme heat and wildfire smoke are turning routine sports decisions into public-health and equity questions, argued Lindsey Burghardt, Sam Schmitz, Jennifer Vanos and Graham Zimmerman at Aspen Ideas: Climate. They said schools, leagues and event organizers should assess conditions at the field—not rely on citywide forecasts—then give trained adults clear authority to alter or stop play, with shade, cooling and hydration built into participation. The speakers’ broader case was that safe outdoor activity cannot depend on a family’s ability to buy private alternatives.
Enforceable Voting Rights Are the Test of American Democracy
Princeton historian Sean Wilentz argues that American democracy has been shaped by two intertwined revolutions: one against arbitrary monarchy and for popular sovereignty, the other against chattel slavery. In his account, neither the Declaration’s equality principle nor the Reconstruction Amendments secured democracy on their own; rights advanced when political mobilization was backed by enforceable federal power, and receded when that protection weakened. He places voting rights and constitutional limits on executive authority at the center of that unfinished struggle.
Phasing Out Fossil Fuels Delivers Immediate Public-Health Benefits
Edward Maibach argues that phasing out fossil fuels should be treated as an immediate public-health intervention, not only a response to future climate risks. Alongside pediatrician Lisa Patel, sanitation advocate Catherine Coleman Flowers and air-quality entrepreneur Darren Riley, he points to local benefits—from fewer asthma exposures near schools and in homes to safer water during floods—that can make decarbonization a more concrete policy choice.
Agency Neglect Risks Turning Public Ownership Into a Case for Selloffs
Former Bureau of Land Management director Tracy Stone-Manning argues that public lands will become vulnerable to privatization or transfer if federal agencies are too depleted to manage them effectively. Joined by Patagonia’s Corley Kenna and conservation advocate Benji Backer, she makes the case that stewardship must pair federal capacity with local participation, Indigenous co-management, and a broader coalition built around the places where people experience climate and environmental change firsthand.
Russia’s Proxy Network Raises Risks as the Regime Weakens
Investigative journalist Christo Grozev argues that Russia’s growing use of private forces, proxies and hired operatives has made its foreign operations less predictable and harder for Western governments to deter. Speaking with The Wall Street Journal’s Yaroslav Trofimov after a screening of Antidote, Grozev said Moscow treats its confrontation with the West as an active war while relying on a dispersed network whose violence may exceed the control or competence of any single command structure. He also contends that corruption, economic strain and elite self-interest are eroding the system behind that threat, though a post-Putin Russia would not necessarily become democratic.
Employers Must Redesign Hiring and Jobs for a Permanently Tighter Labor Market
Steve Dawson and Jerry Rubin argue in Help Wanted that employers should treat the tight labor market as a structural condition, not a temporary hiring cycle that will reverse on its own. They contend that demographic change, lower workforce participation, and limits on immigration require businesses to redesign how they recruit, train, advance, and retain workers—starting with the barriers that screen out or drive away people they need. Their case is that employee-centered practices are not a generic fix but an operational response that must account for each employer’s job design, incentives, and workforce.
Climate Projections Show How Human Choices Shape a Hotter Earth
Climate scientist Kate Marvel argues that a warming planet is already intensifying heat, storms, drought, fire weather and sea-level rise, but that climate models describe conditional futures rather than an inevitable outcome. In a live recording of Scientista, Marvel tells co-hosts Sweta Chakraborty and Monica Medina that ending carbon-dioxide emissions would, by the best current estimate, produce no further warming beyond that point—and that communicating the stakes requires scientists to acknowledge feeling as well as fact. Earth, she argues, remains the only “Good Planet” people have to protect.
Historical Flood Models No Longer Match Current Climate Risk
Climate scientist Sarah Kapnick argues that climate adaptation has become a present-tense management problem because the statistical patterns underlying historical weather and infrastructure design no longer reliably describe current risk. She says companies and governments should treat flood protection, operational continuity and financing as revisable planning decisions—made at both asset and community scale—rather than rely on return periods or wait for a disaster to force action.
Children’s Climate Media Must Pair Honest Facts With Agency
Children are already experiencing climate disruption, and adults should not respond by leaving them to make sense of it alone, Laura Schifter argued in an Aspen Ideas: Climate panel with Al Roker, Sesame Workshop’s Kay Wilson Stallings and producer J.J. Johnson. The panelists said children’s media should match facts and emotional stakes to a viewer’s age—from nature and small acts of care for preschoolers to more direct accounts of danger for older children—while giving them characters, trusted adults and practical ways to act rather than asking them to carry the problem themselves.
Employers Must Redesign Hiring and Retention for a Permanently Tight Labor Market
Steve Dawson and Jerry Rubin argue in Help Wanted that a shrinking and changing workforce makes labor scarcity a long-term business condition, not a cycle employers can wait out. They contend that employers must compete for talent by changing how they recruit, train, manage, and retain workers—especially people routinely filtered out by conventional hiring systems. Their case for employee-centered strategy extends beyond wages to job design, workforce partnerships, and management practices that give workers a role in solving the problems that drive turnover.
Battery Storage’s Next Bottleneck Is Market Design
Battery storage has become practical grid infrastructure, but its further expansion will depend less on cell costs than on whether power markets and regulators pay for the capacity, congestion relief and reliability it provides, said Jupiter Power’s Jack Godshall. Falling costs have made storage deployable, but scaling it requires systems that can value its services, supply equipment affordably and operate a growing fleet. Chibueze Amanchukwu of the University of Chicago argued that sodium-ion and other earth-abundant chemistries illustrate the trade-off: they could lower costs, improve safety and reduce supply-chain dependence, but must compete with increasingly cheap lithium-ion.
Energy Affordability Is Reshaping Climate Politics Across Party Lines
Energy politics is increasingly being fought through affordability rather than explicit climate language, as candidates tie electricity bills, insurance costs and new demand from data centers to household budgets. Mitch Stewart, Brandon Hurlbut and Neil Chatterjee differed over how that shift should shape campaigns and policy, but the discussion’s central tension was clear: pressure to lower costs can support cleaner generation, grid investment and flexibility, or extend the life of fossil-fuel generation and weaken climate commitments.
Water Makes Climate Risk a Fight Over Access and Control
Water is where climate risk becomes an immediate political question: who absorbs flood losses, controls public systems, pays for resilience, and decides how a shared supply is used. In this Aspen Ideas: Climate discussion, organizers and water-policy advocates Alaina Harkness, Melissa Roberts, Colette Battle, and Ryan Strode argue that water can unite people across political divides because its consequences are felt in homes and communities—but that durable resilience depends on local authority, public investment, and organizing that turns opposition into a plan for stewardship.
Food as Medicine Depends on Farms, Kitchens, and Community
Food as medicine depends on more than getting healthier ingredients onto a plate, argues moderator Corby Kummer and a panel of Chicago chefs and food-system leaders: it requires affordable access, viable farms, cooking knowledge and time to turn food into meals. Rick Bayless cautions that treating food as medicine can strip it of pleasure, while Cliff Rome and Sarah Stegner describe teaching kitchens, markets and farmer-support programs as ways to make fresh, local food a durable part of household and community life.
Midwest Climate Development Faces a Test of Cost, Trust, and Local Power
Midwest climate and energy development will endure only if it lowers household costs, reduces local risks and gives residents a meaningful say over projects reshaping their communities, according to Anika Goss, Stephanie Lawson and John Mitterholzer. They argue that data centers, solar buildouts and land reuse should be judged not simply by their climate claims, but by their effects on electricity and water bills, heat, pollution and neighborhood control. The practical task, they say, is to equip local governments and residents with the information, financing and leverage to set better terms before opposition hardens.
Maritime Biofuel Rules Must Balance Bankable Demand and Lifecycle Risk
Maritime decarbonization will depend less on choosing a single replacement fuel than on whether global rules can create bankable demand while distinguishing genuinely lower-carbon supply chains from those that shift emissions elsewhere, the speakers argue. Rod Snyder said shipping is headed toward a multi-fuel future, with U.S. ethanol, woody biomass and e-fuels all seeking a role. But Jennifer Aurandt-Pilgrim’s call to credit documented farm and plant improvements clashes with UC Davis researcher Colin Murphy’s warning that lifecycle standards must also account for indirect land-use change and other market effects beyond a producer’s gate.
Colorado River Negotiations Turn on Who Bears the Shortfall
Colorado River demand has exceeded natural supply for roughly 26 years, drawing down Lakes Mead and Powell as warming reduces runoff even in years of average precipitation, according to Anne Castle and Arizona water director Tom Buschatzke. With current operating rules expiring and no seven-state agreement in place, the basin must decide how to bring use closer to supply—and the article argues that decision cannot be treated as an acre-foot accounting exercise alone. It also bears on tribal access to water rights that have not been developed and on how communities can withstand the economic transition where agricultural use is permanently retired.
Climate Resilience Depends on Community-Led Health Infrastructure
Marshall Hatch, Erik Mikaitis, Kareeshma Ali and Colleen Grogan argue that climate resilience in disinvested neighborhoods cannot be delivered through isolated cooling centers, clinics or green buildings. In West Garfield Park, they say, chronic disease, environmental exposure and limited access to care make climate risk a daily health problem, requiring locally led infrastructure, preventive investment and institutions willing to share power. Their case is for patient capital and durable partnerships that build on community trust rather than exporting short-term solutions.
Blue Finance Requires Revenue, Risk Sharing, and Verifiable Ecological Results
Ocean conservation lacks the dependable revenue streams that private investors typically require, Joan Larrea of Convergence argued, so blue finance must instead connect restoration to avoided losses, sovereign debt savings, supply-chain resilience or other measurable exposures. Larrea, insurance executive Liz Henderson and marine scientist Steven Kessel said debt swaps, catastrophe coverage and corporate-backed arrangements can direct capital toward coastal ecosystems, but only if they account for ecological interdependence, local implementation capacity and credible evidence of results.
Democracies’ Strategic Edge Depends on Diplomacy and Allied Unity
Former US ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul argues that democracies retain substantial military, economic, and institutional advantages over authoritarian rivals, but only if they use diplomacy, sustain alliances, and act collectively. McFaul contends that US overreach in Iran, estrangement from democratic partners, and retreat from international institutions risk squandering those advantages as China and Russia challenge the liberal order.
Russia’s Nuclear Bastion Makes Arctic Access a NATO Priority
Russia’s nuclear forces on the Kola Peninsula make the Arctic a direct NATO security concern, Norway’s Chief of Defense Eirik Kristoffersen argues, linking the region to Atlantic defense and U.S. homeland security. Kristoffersen, U.S. Arctic Research Commission chair Thomas Dans and Finnish state secretary Pasi Rajala contend that expanded NATO membership must be matched by ice-capable forces, polar-orbit communications and persistent surveillance. They also argue that alliance coordination should coexist with limited practical cooperation with Russia on shared Arctic problems.
Rwanda Ties Congo Settlement to FDLR Neutralization
Rwandan Interior Minister Vincent Biruta argues that the Washington peace accord will not hold unless the Democratic Republic of the Congo neutralizes the FDLR, which Kigali describes as the enduring security threat behind its defensive measures in eastern Congo. He says Rwanda has met its obligations and wants the United States to pressure both sides more evenly, while rejecting claims that Rwanda is pursuing Congolese territory or directing M23. Biruta presents the dispute as one over security and Congolese governance, rather than a border conflict.
Guarantees and Local Capital Are Reframing Development as Shared Security
As official development assistance contracts, Alice Albright argues that foreign assistance should be reframed as a shared national-security and economic interest, with governments using guarantees, commercial tools, and new sources of capital to finance prevention. Alaa Murabit, Ana Zacapa, and Comfort Ero extend that case to locally rooted organizations, rural businesses, and trusted community networks, while warning that resilience finance cannot substitute for diplomacy or institutions able to manage active conflict.
UN Members Must Organize Around the Charter When Veto Powers Fail
Annalena Baerbock, president of the UN General Assembly and Germany’s former foreign minister, argues that the UN’s authority depends less on overcoming great-power vetoes than on its wider membership using the institutions and political leverage it already has. General Assembly votes cannot end wars or replace implementation, she says, but states that share an interest in the UN Charter can set common positions, resist attempts to bypass the system, and press for reforms in representation and management.
Election Doubt and Unchecked War Policy Erode Institutional Trust
Ben Rhodes and Tommy Vietor argue that public distrust of institutions follows when officials invoke threats to elections or national security without accepting accountability for evidence, consequences, or failure. They distinguish foreign influence campaigns from vote manipulation, warning that unproven election claims can still furnish a pretext to challenge democratic outcomes. In foreign policy, they contend that Congress, public opinion, and stronger diplomatic institutions must constrain a Washington culture that too readily defaults to war, sanctions, and arms transfers.
Aspen Security Forum Closes With Recognition of Partners and Staff
Niamh King closed the 2024 Aspen Security Forum by crediting the partners, attendees, speakers, public officials, media, Aspen Institute leadership and staff behind four days of programming. She singled out Anja Manuel for her discussion of American trade with Jamieson Greer, thanked the organizing team for its work, and recognized the forum’s corporate and foundation partners. King reserved her final acknowledgment for Aspen’s “big fat bears and terrifying moose,” which she said brought a “frisson” to the conference.
American Resilience Depends on Defending Civic Rather Than Hereditary Institutions
The American inheritance is civic rather than hereditary, and its durability depends on institutions that are defended rather than merely celebrated. Karl Rove warned that treating American identity as a matter of ancestry reverses the Declaration’s anti-aristocratic premise, while Kori Schake and Jane Harman argued that political pressure on the military and failures of constitutional restraint put democratic norms at risk. Their shared case was that American resilience is a historical record, not a guarantee.
Security Plans Fail Without Legitimate Political Authority
Salam Fayyad, Kim Ghattas, Amaney Jamal and Herro Mustafa argue that the Middle East’s security crises cannot be resolved through military pressure or technocratic arrangements alone. In Lebanon, Gaza and Iraq, they say, armed groups can be constrained only by institutions with the authority, capacity and political legitimacy to govern; regional integration, meanwhile, remains tied to Palestinian statehood rather than efforts to bypass it.
U.S. Indo-Pacific Deterrence Depends on Sustained Allied Capacity
Former U.S. ambassador to Japan Rahm Emanuel argues that China’s escalating coercion around Taiwan will test whether the United States can turn its alliances with Japan, the Philippines and Taiwan into a barrier to a quarantine or blockade. Alongside Anja Manuel and Lowy Institute executive director Michael Fullilove, he contends that military arrangements remain substantial but deterrence is weakened by inadequate stockpiles, competing crises and doubts about U.S. political resolve. Their central claim is that allies can add capacity and coordinate more closely, but cannot replace sustained American leadership.
Israel’s War Has Made an Unchanged U.S. Aid Relationship Unsustainable
The panel’s central dispute was whether Washington can make its security relationship with Israel more conditional—or phase down aid—without sacrificing the leverage and regional influence that a deeper break could forfeit. Dan Shapiro argued for a managed transition that preserves Israel’s deterrence and U.S. influence; Dahlia Scheindlin saw conditionality as an increasingly durable political response to Israeli policy, prolonged war and civilian harm. Ted Deutch countered that aid policy cannot be serious if it treats Israel as solely responsible for a conflict in which Hamas and other regional actors retain agency.
Iran’s Military Losses Have Not Ended Its Leverage Over Hormuz
Former U.S. national security official Robert Greenway argues that U.S. military action has reduced Iran’s nuclear, missile and drone capabilities enough to justify eliminating its remaining ability to threaten regional trade and energy flows. Senator Chris Murphy counters that Tehran’s survival and continued leverage over the Strait of Hormuz have left Washington with a weaker hand in any future negotiation. Carnegie’s Karim Sadjadpour adds that a militarily diminished Iran may nonetheless emerge more confident that coercion works.
Safadi Says Regional Security Requires Palestinian Statehood and Sovereign Borders
Jordanian Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi argues that the region’s wars cannot be contained through ceasefires or military arrangements alone: durable security requires respect for state sovereignty, lawful access to shipping and humanitarian aid, and a political path to Palestinian statehood. In a conversation moderated by NBC’s Andrea Mitchell, Safadi says Jordan supports diplomacy with Iran, a gradual restoration of Lebanon’s state control over weapons, and Gaza aid access independent of stalled governance plans, while warning that Israeli settlement expansion is closing off the two-state solution.
Türkiye’s S-400 Dispute Still Blocks a Deeper U.S. Defense Relationship
Akif Çağatay Kılıç, Türkiye’s chief adviser on national security and foreign policy, argues that Ankara’s geography requires it to keep working relationships open across rival blocs, from NATO and the EU to Russia, Ukraine and Iran. He presents Türkiye as a venue for diplomacy rather than a power able to dictate settlements, while acknowledging that its own defense ties with the United States remain constrained by the unresolved dispute over its Russian S-400 system and access to F-35 aircraft.
Military Leverage Alone Cannot Secure Lasting Political Outcomes
Former national security officials Stephen Hadley, Robert O’Brien and Michèle Flournoy, alongside AEI’s Marc Thiessen, disagreed over whether Trump’s use of military force, tariffs and allied pressure can produce arrangements that last beyond his presidency. Thiessen and O’Brien argued that coercion has forced overdue changes in allied defense spending and constrained adversaries; Flournoy and Hadley warned that military damage, strained alliances and inconsistent signals do not by themselves constitute strategy. Their central question was whether immediate leverage can be converted into durable deterrence, political settlements and institutions.
Democratic Transitions in the Americas Depend on Public Ownership
Democratic transitions in the Americas risk losing legitimacy when security-first or externally coordinated roadmaps lack credible evidence that power will change hands and domestic political ownership. Leopoldo López argued that Venezuela needs visible steps toward a credible election and the dismantling of repressive institutions; OAS secretary general Albert Ramdin backed country-specific pathways that extend beyond elections to durable governance. Former Haitian foreign minister Dominique Dupuy warned that Haiti’s prolonged interim rule shows how transition plans can perpetuate exclusion when the public remains outside the political process.
Tariff Access Is Becoming a Supply-Chain Security Test
U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer argues that U.S. trade policy should use tariffs, market access and security conditions to redirect production toward the United States and North America while limiting exposure to China-linked supply chains. He describes a durable hierarchy of access—not a return to pre-tariff trade—in which companies can plan around known rates but must meet stricter origin, investment and export-control rules. China, in his account, is a commercial relationship to be bounded rather than reformed through negotiation.
Energy Security Is Shifting From Just-in-Time to Just-in-Case
Fatih Birol of the International Energy Agency argues that energy security is shifting from a just-in-time model built around cheap supply to a more expensive “just in case” system of reserves, alternate routes, grids and trusted partners. Alongside Meghan O’Sullivan of Harvard and former U.S. deputy energy secretary Daniel Poneman, he contends that disruptions from Hormuz to mineral refining expose a wider set of dependencies: electricity and nuclear fuel, transmission capacity, processing and long-term finance. The central constraint, they argue, is not simply resource availability but the ability to build and sustain resilient supply systems.
Space Security Depends on Networks, Ground Systems and Supply Chains
Space has become a civilian and military dependency whose security architecture has not kept pace with the ways adversaries can disrupt it, argues Kari Bingen of the Center for Strategic and International Studies. The panel’s broader case is that securing space now means protecting an interconnected orbital and terrestrial system: proliferated constellations may make satellites harder to disable, but ground networks, terminals, data links and layered suppliers remain vulnerable to attack or compromise. As commercial activity expands, Heather Pringle of the Space Foundation argues, the rules and norms for managing this increasingly congested and contested domain have lagged behind.
Free Societies Must Adapt Without Abandoning Their Ideals
Anja Manuel, executive director of the Aspen Strategy Group and Aspen Security Forum, argued that rapid shifts in artificial intelligence, conflict and economic power require leaders to test “too hard, audacious” ideas rather than merely react to events. Opening the forum, she said adaptation must remain anchored in the ideals of free societies, as technology, wars and new growth centres reshape the international order.
The Security Forum Culminates Year-Round Work on U.S. Strategy
Nicholas Burns, co-chair of the Aspen Strategy Group and former U.S. ambassador to China, framed the Aspen Security Forum as the annual culmination of work conducted throughout the year on foreign policy, defense, military affairs and homeland security. He said the group’s model links off-the-record discussions with U.S. military services, sustained homeland-security work and focused deliberation on U.S.-China relations and America’s wider position in East Asia.
The “Nones” Category Obscures Americans’ Spiritual and Moral Lives
Harvard’s Richard Parker and USC’s Diane Winston argue that journalists should not treat the 29% of Americans labeled religious “nones” as people without belief, moral commitments or sources of meaning. In a Faith Angle Forum discussion, Winston contends that the secular-sacred divide obscures how religion, politics, markets, culture and technology shape one another, while Parker warns that survey categories and polling trends cannot provide a full account of a person’s life. Their shared prescription is to report beyond affiliation labels without collapsing every cultural or political commitment into religion.
Political Neutrality Leaves Immigration Advocacy Threshold Unresolved
Latter-day Saint apostle Clark Gilbert argues that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints should remain politically neutral on immigration while serving members affected by enforcement through legal aid, education, humanitarian assistance and local ministry. At the Faith Angle Forum, journalists pressed him on whether care within the existing system is enough when detention and deportation threaten congregations. Gilbert defended neutrality as protection against partisan capture but did not identify when public opposition to government policy would be required.
Partisan Identity Is Reshaping Religious Belief and Political Mobilization
University of Notre Dame political scientist David Campbell argues that religion and politics shape each other: partisan identity can drive changes in religious affiliation, moral judgment, and the meaning Americans attach to labels such as Christian or secular. In a Faith Angle Forum discussion with New York Times *Believing* newsletter writer Lauren Jackson, he says Republican appeals to threatened Christian identity remain potent but limited, while Jackson hears from religiously and politically unsettled readers seeking belonging, hope, and a public language that does not reduce faith to a voting bloc.
America’s Economic Edge Requires Hard Choices on Deficits, Housing, and Allies
Former Federal Reserve vice-chair Roger W. Ferguson Jr., in conversation with Piper Sandler chief global economist Nancy Lazar for the Hurst Lecture Series, argues that the US economy remains fundamentally strong but increasingly dependent on difficult political choices. Ferguson points to AI investment, deep capital markets, Fed credibility and the dollar as enduring advantages, while warning that deficits, housing shortages, immigration policy, inflation’s aftereffects and fraying alliances threaten the system that supports them. His confidence is conditional: the US can correct course, but only if policymakers accept costs voters have largely resisted.
Israeli-Palestinian Artists Keep a Shared Jerusalem Space Open Through War
At the Aspen Ideas Festival, Feel Beit co-directors Riman Barakat and Karen Brunwasser present their Jerusalem cultural center as a test of Israeli-Palestinian partnership under war, not apart from it. They argue that the center has survived since October 7 because it does not ask artists or audiences to mute their identities or grief, but uses music, performance and conversation to keep a shared civic space open when politics and violence are pulling it apart.
Adobe and Robotics Recast Ancient Craft as Future Infrastructure
At the Aspen Ideas Festival, artists Beatriz Cortez and Ronald Rael argue that ancient technologies should be treated not as primitive artifacts but as active systems of intelligence. Through Cortez’s work with migration, steel, plants, and Indigenous temporalities, and Rael’s experiments with adobe, robotics, and the U.S.-Mexico borderlands, they make the case that innovation depends less on leaving ancestral knowledge behind than on bringing it into contact with contemporary tools.
Liberal Education Is a Condition of the American Republic
Shilo Brooks, president and CEO of the George W. Bush Presidential Center, argues that America’s 250th anniversary should be treated as a test of civic formation, not an exercise in commemoration. In a conversation with the Aspen Institute’s Todd Breyfogle, Brooks makes the case that self-government depends on liberal education: citizens reading seriously, examining their own false convictions, practicing moderation, and learning to argue without contempt. His warning is that civic ignorance is not just an educational failure but a constitutional problem for a republic in which the people are meant to rule.
Weak Voting Protections Keep American Election Law on the Battlefield
At the Aspen Ideas Festival, election-law scholars and political practitioners argued that the immediate danger for 2026 is less a miscounted Election Day than a close election whose count is challenged, delayed or delegitimized afterward. Rick Hasen, Benjamin Ginsberg, Sarah Isgur and Janai Nelson largely trusted local administrators to count ballots, but split over what makes elections legitimate: administrative competence, equal access to the franchise, limits on federal and judicial power, stronger parties, or a constitutional right to vote.
AI Growth Depends on Power, Permitting, and Broader Ownership
BlackRock chief executive Larry Fink used an Aspen Ideas Festival conversation with Fareed Zakaria to argue that AI can sustain a new phase of U.S. growth only if the country builds the physical infrastructure behind it. Fink’s case was that power grids, data centers, skilled labor, faster permitting and deeper capital markets matter as much as algorithms — and that the political test is whether more households can own a share of the gains rather than watch them accrue to a narrow set of companies and investors.
A Passionate Life Requires Educated Desire, Not Measurable Intelligence
In an Aspen Ideas Festival talk, David Brooks argues that a passionate life is not a matter of intensity or youth but of forming desire around what is worth loving. Brooks sets that view against institutions — schools, meritocracy and AI among them — that define people too narrowly by intelligence, measurement and efficiency. His answer is a humanist one: people remain capable of growth at any age when curiosity, beauty, work, responsibility and love continue to enlarge them.
The Dinner Party Recasts Women’s Art as Monumental History
Artist and filmmaker Tiffany Shlain argues that Judy Chicago’s The Dinner Party is an essential American artwork because it makes women’s histories visible at monumental scale. In her reflection for the Aspen Institute Arts Program’s Art of America series, Shlain presents the installation as a feminist reclamation that uses forms long associated with women’s art to assert that women helped create the country’s history.
Muhammad Ali Made Media Mastery Part of the Fight Itself
Composer and conductor Teddy Abrams argues that Muhammad Ali’s first fight against Sonny Liston became an American cultural event before Ali entered the ring. In the Aspen Institute Arts Program’s Art of America series, Abrams frames Ali’s media campaign against the favored Liston as psychological theater that turned sport, news, performance, and public identity into one event. For Abrams, Ali’s significance lies in how he used attention itself as a medium, becoming a figure that American culture both made possible and needed.
The Wide Awakes Eye Turned Abolitionist Politics Into Civic Action
Artist Hank Willis Thomas argues that the Wide Awakes eye, a graphic emblem of an antislavery political movement in 1860, should be understood as a call to civic attention rather than a decorative symbol. In the Aspen Institute Arts Program’s Art of America series, Thomas traces how the eye worked through parades, banners, uniforms, and public spectacle, linking visual form to political action. He connects that history to current debates over being “woke,” asking how awareness becomes civic participation.
The Declaration’s Equality Claim Outgrew the Founders’ Intentions
Ken Burns reads John Trumbull’s Declaration of Independence as a familiar but romanticized image of the American founding whose significance lies in its contradiction. In the Aspen Institute Arts Program’s Art of America series, Burns argues that the painting captures both the announcement of a radical claim, that “all men are created equal,” and the fact that the men making it did not extend that equality to enslaved people, women, Native Americans, Black Americans, or the poor. Its force, in his account, is that the universal language exceeded the founders’ intent and became a principle later generations could use against the limits of the founding itself.
Mark Rothko’s Color Fields Reveal America’s Possibility and Tragedy
Director Simon Godwin argues that Mark Rothko’s abstractions define a vision of America through scale, color and emotional force rather than literal scenery. Recalling his first encounters with Rothko’s paintings in London, Godwin says their “American grandeur” lies in a charged doubleness: beauty and tragedy, outward vastness and inward longing, possibility and loss.
Public Art Reopens Erased Histories Through Civic Imagination
At the Aspen Ideas Festival, artists Walter Hood, Janet Echelman and Glenn Kaino argued that imagination is not an ornamental artistic faculty but a civic practice, one that lets Americans contest official memory, inhabit public space differently and imagine plural futures. In a conversation moderated by Megan O’Grady, they described public art as most powerful when it resists fixed interpretation, draws viewers into bodily experience and keeps alive forms of attention that metrics, politics and technology tend to flatten.
Ancient Material Knowledge Is a Blueprint for Future Technology
Artists Beatriz Cortez and Ronald Rael argue that ancient material knowledge should be treated not as artifact but as technology still capable of shaping the future. In a discussion at the Aspen Ideas Festival, they make the case through steel, adobe, volcanic ash, border wall fragments, seeds, caves, and robots: older forms of intelligence can work with contemporary tools rather than be displaced by them. Their shared target is the assumption that innovation means leaving ancestral knowledge behind.
American Checks Still Exist, but the Branches Have Stopped Using Them
In an Aspen Ideas Festival panel, Maya Kornberg, Jack Goldsmith and Stephen Vladeck argue that American democracy’s formal checks remain on paper but are failing in practice because Congress, the presidency and the Supreme Court are no longer performing their constitutional roles. Kornberg points to a weakened, under-capacitated Congress; Goldsmith to the long expansion of executive power, intensified under Donald Trump; and Vladeck to a Supreme Court that he says has become insufficiently accountable and too willing to enable presidential power. Their shared problem is that repairing the system depends on the same institutions that have helped unbalance it.
Middle Powers Need U.S. Power to Resist Chinese Coercion
Middle powers are seeking leverage between a less reliable Washington and a more coercive Beijing, but the speakers argued that coordination cannot substitute for American power. In a Jonathan Capehart-moderated Aspen Ideas Festival panel, Chrystia Freeland, Sadanand Dhume, and Shannon O’Neil said countries outside the two dominant powers need deeper cooperation, but remain constrained by divergent interests, supply-chain dependence, collective-action problems, and the continuing indispensability of the United States.
Brain Health Care Is Shifting From Late Treatment to Integrated Prevention
At an Aspen Ideas Festival panel, Arianna Huffington, Richard Isaacson and Wendy Bartie argued that brain health should be treated as an integrated prevention problem rather than a late-life specialty concern. Using Alzheimer’s, mental health, workplace stress and drug development as reference points, they made the case for earlier risk detection, more specific behavioral prescriptions, continued pharmaceutical innovation and care models that expand access. Their shared warning was that separating medicine from daily behavior, or innovation from access, leaves the central problem only partly addressed.
Hollywood’s Bridge-Building Depends on Restraint, Curiosity, and Audience Trust
At the Aspen Ideas Festival, Steven Olikara of Bridge Entertainment Labs framed America’s polarization as a storytelling problem and argued that film and television can counter caricature by making people more fully seen. Filmmakers Brian Grazer, Joshua Seftel and Christina Voros made the case that such bridge-building does not come from didactic civic messaging, but from specific worlds, trusted messengers, emotional restraint and stories that let audiences encounter dignity, grief and conflict before they retreat into categories.
People Underestimate How Rewarding Small Social Interactions Will Be
University of Chicago behavioral scientist Nicholas Epley argues that people routinely forgo small acts of connection because they wrongly expect them to be awkward, unwelcome or unrewarding. In a research-focused Aspen Ideas Festival conversation with Kelly Corrigan, Epley says that misprediction affects encounters with strangers and friends alike, from starting a conversation to expressing gratitude or offering condolences. His case is not for constant sociability, but for testing the pessimistic forecasts that keep people from reaching out.
Fourth of July Speeches Cast the Declaration as an Unfinished Obligation
Bryan Doerries’s Aspen closing session used Fourth of July speeches by Frederick Douglass, Abraham Lincoln and the women’s-rights leaders of 1876 to argue that America’s founding language remains an obligation rather than a settled inheritance. Framed through Theater of War’s town-hall model, the session treated the Declaration of Independence as promise, evidence and indictment: a vocabulary repeatedly invoked by people excluded from its protections to demand that the republic enforce the principles it celebrates.
Washington’s Anti-Ultra-Processed Food Push Splits Food-System Reformers
In “The American Wellness Paradox,” White House adviser Calley Means and NYU emerita professor Marion Nestle argue from shared ground that ultra-processed food, refined carbohydrates, poor school meals, weak regulation and chronic disease are failures of the US health system. Their dispute is over what a politically empowered food-reform agenda should do with that diagnosis: Means presents the Trump administration’s moves on dietary guidelines, SNAP, procurement and additives as a historic breakthrough, while Nestle says the same opening demands stronger science, cleaner execution and deeper reform of agriculture and food access.
Dallas Targets Permitting Delays as Denver Reports Homelessness Drop
Dallas Mayor Eric Johnson and Denver Mayor Mike Johnston argue that city government’s housing role is operational: remove the local barriers that block production, or build a homelessness system that moves people indoors and into permanent housing. In an excerpted City Hall discussion, Johnson casts Dallas’s affordability problem as a supply failure worsened by permitting friction, while Johnston says Denver reduced street homelessness by rapidly adding acceptable transitional units, closing encampments, colocating services, and linking the hardest cases to treatment and courts.
The American Dream Depends on Rebuilding Trust in Institutions
At the Aspen Ideas Festival, business and civic leaders argued that the American dream remains politically useful only if it is treated as unfinished work rather than a settled promise. Samantha Tweedy, Tom Wilson, Brian Hooks and Skye Perryman differed on how much responsibility business should bear, but tied declining trust in institutions to unequal access to opportunity, economic insecurity and threats to democratic rights. Their shared case was that rebuilding the dream requires concrete institutional action, local problem-solving and a broader account of freedom than markets or formal rights alone can provide.
Digital-Asset Rules Near Senate Test as Lawmakers Negotiate Three Safeguards
At the Aspen Ideas Festival, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand argued that Congress can no longer leave digital assets in a regulatory gray zone as crypto, stablecoins and token markets become more widely used. In conversation with Jonathan Capehart, she made the case for bipartisan legislation that would split oversight between the SEC and CFTC while adding ethics rules for public officials, stronger consumer protections and enforcement against illicit finance. Gillibrand presented the effort as a test of whether lawmakers can govern a fast-moving financial sector without either protecting incumbents or deferring to crypto issuers.
Young State Lawmakers Are Building Trust Without the Staff to Sustain It
At the Aspen Ideas Festival, young state lawmakers and Future Caucus CEO Layla Zaidane argued that statehouses are becoming the more consequential and more reachable arena of American democracy. Indiana Republican Beau Baird and West Virginia Democrat Kayla Young described legislatures where bipartisan work is still possible because officials remain close to constituents, but also warned that part-time pay, minimal staff, safety risks, weak local news and supermajority incentives make the work hard to sustain.
One Semester of Civics Cannot Sustain Democratic Agency
In an Aspen Ideas Festival session with Kelly Corrigan, civics educator Sharon McMahon argues that American democracy is weakened by civic ignorance, thin school requirements and an information environment where charisma often substitutes for accountability. Her case is that civics cannot be treated as a one-semester subject: citizens need enough knowledge to understand power, evaluate sources, tolerate disagreement and act without giving in to despair.
Iran MOU Tests Whether U.S. Strikes Created Leverage Over Tehran
At the Aspen Ideas Festival, Fareed Zakaria, Kim Ghattas, Karim Sadjadpour and Mark Dubowitz debated whether the U.S.-Iran war and the subsequent memorandum of understanding left Washington with leverage or exposed the limits of American coercion. Dubowitz argued that U.S. and Israeli strikes badly weakened Iran’s nuclear, missile and proxy capabilities, while Zakaria and Sadjadpour said Tehran may have gained a new strategic weapon in the Strait of Hormuz and learned that escalation works. Ghattas placed the argument in regional terms, warning that Lebanon, Gulf states, Iranians and Israelis are now living inside an unstable cease-fire whose documents are being read differently by every side.
College Alternatives Risk Tracking Poor Students Away From Opportunity
At the Aspen Ideas Festival, education leaders Shavar Jeffries, Ted Mitchell and Aneesh Sohoni argued that college remains a crucial route to mobility, but only if it is made more accessible, transparent and connected to work without becoming a tracking system. Their central warning was that “college alternatives” can expand opportunity when they are stackable and portable, but can also reproduce inequality when poor, Black, Latino and rural students are steered away from degrees while affluent families still treat college as the default. The panel framed higher education’s task as broader than earnings alone: it must prepare students for changing labor markets while preserving purpose, agency and the ability to choose among futures.
Only 16% of Americans Report Feeling Financially Fulfilled
Edward Jones chief executive Penny Pennington and Gallup chief executive Jon Clifton argue that wealth is a poor proxy for how well Americans are living. Drawing on new Edward Jones-Gallup research presented at the Aspen Ideas Festival, they say only 16% of Americans — and 5% of Gen Z — feel financially fulfilled, a measure they define as money aligned with values, positive emotions, agency and confidence about the future. Their case is that financial advice, employers and families need to engage with money as an emotional and relational issue, not only as a matter of income, assets or literacy.
Music’s Future Is Framed as Conversation, Not Prediction
At the Aspen Ideas Festival, Damian Woetzel, Caroline Shaw and Charles Yang turned a question about the sound of 2276 into an argument about what music should preserve. Rather than forecast future genres or technologies, they treated music as a continuing exchange among inherited forms, bodily practice and responsive listening. Through discussion and performance, Shaw and Yang made the case that the future worth hoping for is not novelty for its own sake, but musical conversation marked by curiosity, attention and mutual respect.
Liberal Democracy’s Crisis Is Capacity, Not a Superior Rival
At the Aspen Ideas Festival, Francis Fukuyama, Chrystia Freeland, David French and Fareed Zakaria argued that liberal democracy is in a serious internal crisis but has not been displaced by a more viable political model. Fukuyama said no universal successor to liberal democracy has emerged; Freeland pointed to Ukraine as evidence that decentralized democratic societies can still mobilize effectively; and French warned that liberalism’s critics often identify real social failures before turning to authoritarian remedies. Their shared concern was that democracies will keep feeding strongman politics unless they can deliver purpose, competence, representation and trust.
A 10-Year Civic Campaign Aims to Turn Local Trust Into Action
At the Aspen Ideas Festival, Heather Gerken, Brian Hooks, Jane Wales and other civic and philanthropic leaders cast Be the People as a decade-long effort to counter civic isolation by reconnecting Americans with local problem-solving. Their argument is that Americans retain more trust, generosity and desire to contribute than national political narratives suggest, but need institutions, cultural messengers and community organizations that make that shared agency visible and usable.
Trust Is Built Through Repeated Practice, Not Civic Sentiment
At Dan Porterfield’s final Aspen Ideas Festival as president and CEO of the Aspen Institute, leaders of Weave, Aspen Kyiv and the Institute’s network strategy made a shared case that trust is not a civic sentiment but a capacity built through repeated practice. Frederick Riley argued that local trust must be rebuilt neighbor by neighbor; Yuliya Tychkivska described dialogue and leadership formation under wartime exhaustion in Ukraine; and Tommy Loper said Aspen’s dispersed alumni and programs need stronger connective tissue to turn relationships into usable institutional strength.
The Declaration’s Promise Now Depends on Political Reform and Shared Symbols
At the Aspen Ideas Festival session “General Assembly: The Idea of America,” Danielle Allen, Martha Jones, Shilo Brooks and Reihan Salam treated the Declaration of Independence as a living inheritance whose authority now depends on more than anniversary reverence. Their shared dispute was over what must sustain its claim of equality in a changed country: Allen emphasized institutional reform and democratic accountability, Jones insisted on confronting slavery, citizenship and present contradictions, Shilo Brooks stressed the moral and philosophical force behind equality, and Salam argued that a credal nation still needs a culture capable of carrying shared symbols across demographic change.
Federal Cuts Put Local Public Media Stations in Immediate Jeopardy
PBS chief executive Paula Kerger and filmmaker Ken Burns argue that the 2025 rescission of federal public broadcasting funds was not another routine funding fight but a sudden institutional crisis for local stations that had already budgeted for the money. In an Aspen Ideas Festival discussion, they make the case that public media’s future depends on treating it as locally rooted civic infrastructure: a system that supports education, emergency communications, long-form documentary work and communities the commercial market often does not serve.
A 30-Year Retirement Requires Income, Not Just Savings
At the Aspen Ideas Festival, Karen Andres, Allison Schrager, Jaime Magyera, Thasunda Duckett and Ida Rademacher framed longer lifespans as an affordability problem for a retirement system still built around shorter lives, uneven workplace access and account balances rather than dependable income. Their central argument was that a 100-year life requires more than urging households to save more: plans must start earlier, use automatic defaults, preserve liquidity, widen access and embed guaranteed income before retirement.
Rural Opportunity Requires Childcare, Jobs, and Benefits Built Together
At the Aspen Ideas Festival, Cynthia McFadden led a discussion with Derek Kilmer of the Rockefeller Foundation, Save the Children’s Janti Soeripto and South Carolina community leader Pamela McKnight on why rural opportunity policy fails when jobs, childcare, food, housing, broadband and benefits are treated separately. The speakers argued that rural families experience those systems together, and that economic mobility depends on investing in both work and family infrastructure through locally designed partnerships. Their case was that rural America is not a single problem to be solved from Washington, but an underinvested set of communities where access, administrative complexity and inflexible funding often determine whether children and parents can use opportunities that formally exist.
Public Memory Must Show Its Work When History Is Contested
At the Aspen Ideas Festival panel “The Architecture of Remembrance,” historians and designers argued that public memory should neither preserve comforting myths nor replace them with a single corrective story. Jane Kamensky, Walter Hood and Carol Quillen made the case that monuments, historic sites and civic landscapes should show evidence, recover erased people and places, and trust visitors to confront contradiction. Their shared premise was that remembrance is an active public practice, shaped by discovery, design and democratic process.
Family-Led Models Aim to Scale Child Care, Housing, and Health Supports
At the Aspen Ideas Festival, Ascend’s Anne Mosle and parent adviser Carolina Salas framed family policy as a design problem that should start with families’ lived expertise, not agency silos. In a conversation with Maria Rodman, Katie Albright and Laura Migus, they argued that practical models already exist for housing, child care, health care, education and community support, but that scaling them depends on preserving local family leadership and forcing institutions to coordinate around how families actually live.
Trust-Building Starts With Shared Local Work, Not Political Reform
At the Aspen Ideas Festival, David Brooks of the Aspen Institute and Allstate chief executive Tom Wilson argued that America’s trust problem cannot be repaired first from Washington or by institutional reform alone. They described trust as a practice built through repeated local action: shared work, cross-generational contact, respect across disagreement, and everyday habits that make people feel seen. Their case was that politics is more likely to follow such a civic revival than lead it.
Rebuilding Trust in Science Requires Transparency, Accountability, and Public Presence
At the Aspen Ideas Festival, Jenn White, Laurie Santos, Mike Varshavski and Matthias Berninger examined why confidence in science has weakened even as science remains more trusted than many institutions. Their shared argument was that trust cannot be restored by asserting expertise more forcefully: scientists, doctors, universities and companies have to make evidence more visible, acknowledge past failures, show up where people seek information, and explain uncertainty and disagreement as part of the scientific method rather than a reason to dismiss it.
A Shared Civic Gospel Depends on Arguing Over Who Belongs
At the Aspen Ideas Festival, Jane Kamensky, Walter Russell Mead and David French examined whether the Declaration of Independence can still serve as a shared American civic gospel in a religiously plural democracy. Kamensky argued for treating the Declaration as a usable national creed, French said its rights language gives Americans an internal standard for condemning oppression, and Mead cautioned that American identity has always rested on belonging as well as belief. The panel’s central question was not whether Americans can recite “all men are created equal,” but why they assent to it, whom it includes, and how it can be taught without becoming sectarian rule.
Verification and Disclosure Become Journalism’s Test as Distribution Decentralizes
At the Aspen Ideas Festival, Katie Couric, Aaron Parnas, Jerusalem Demsas and Jelani Cobb argued that journalism’s future cannot be understood as a simple contest between legacy outlets and new media. Their debate centered on a harder problem: distribution has moved to platforms, creators and AI systems faster than verification, disclosure and accountability have adapted. The speakers disagreed over whether institutional journalism or decentralized media has done more damage when it fails, but treated trust, standards and local-news collapse as democratic questions rather than industry housekeeping.
Dying People Teach the Living to Plan, Speak Plainly, and Be Present
Death doula and cultural anthropologist Darnell Walker and comedian Tig Notaro argue that dying clarifies the ordinary obligations of living: to notice small moments, say what should not remain unsaid, plan where possible, and be present when there is nothing to fix. In a conversation centered on Notaro’s documentary about poet Andrea Gibson’s final year, they frame end-of-life care less as a specialized service than as a human practice of attention, honesty, humor, and accompaniment.
American Song Carries National Contradictions Through Migration and Reinvention
Pianist Lara Downes frames “Hold These Truths,” an Aspen Ideas Festival performance marking America’s 250th anniversary, as a search for America through song rather than a patriotic retrospective. With Leyla McCalla, Valerie June, Nathaniel Rateliff, Joshua Redman and Wyatt Ellis, she argues that American music carries the country’s contradictions by changing as people migrate, borrow, adapt and reinterpret. The program treats spirituals, Creole songs, ragtime, jazz, bluegrass, contemporary songwriting and “Amazing Grace” as evidence that inherited songs stay alive not by remaining fixed, but by being remade.
Healthy Buildings Should Become the Baseline, Not a Premium Upgrade
At Aspen Ideas: Health, Joseph Allen, Rachel Hodgdon and Diana Araoz-Fraser argue that buildings should be treated as public-health infrastructure, not neutral containers for daily life. Their case is that the prevailing baseline still tolerates poor ventilation, weak filtration, chemical exposure, heat risk, inaccessible design and other hazards, even though technical fixes are already available. The remaining challenge, they say, is to make health a standard requirement in codes, retrofits and ordinary buildings rather than a premium feature in elite projects.
South Texas Longevity Project Could Reach 1 Million Residents
Methodist Healthcare Ministries chief executive Jaime Wesolowski and Blue Zones founder Dan Buettner argue that a longevity effort in South Texas should start from the Rio Grande Valley’s existing strengths, not from a deficit model. In an Aspen Ideas: Health session, they make the case that poverty, uninsurance, chronic disease, and infrastructure gaps coexist with family, faith, social connection, and food traditions that can support longer, healthier lives if local institutions change the environments shaping daily behavior. The project, initially imagined for one city, may expand to seven cities and reach at least 1 million people.
Public Health Crises Test Authority, Partnerships, and Public Confidence
At Aspen Ideas: Health, John Nkengasong, Alex Azar and Margaret Hamburg argued that crisis leadership in public health depends less on improvisation than on authority, trust and institutional capacity built before emergencies hit. Drawing on COVID-19, Operation Warp Speed, drug-resistant tuberculosis in New York and Ebola in the DRC, they made the case that leaders must align political power with technical judgment, work through credible partners, and communicate uncertainty without inflating or minimizing risk.
Feeling Better, Not Willpower, Drives Sustainable Healthy Habits
Psychologist Beth Cabrera’s forthcoming book, “Being Well: A Positive Path to a Healthier, Happier You,” argues that healthier habits are less likely to come from discipline than from making the desired behavior feel rewarding and easy in the present. Drawing on behavioral science and positive psychology, Cabrera says people should design their environments, social cues, and self-talk to work with the brain’s bias toward immediacy, ease, threat detection, and belonging rather than treating those tendencies as failures of willpower.
Brain Health Moves From Late-Life Treatment to Preventive System Design
Arianna Huffington, Bristol Myers Squibb’s Wendy Bartie, and neurologist Richard Isaacson argue that brain health should be treated as a continuum running from everyday cognition and mental health to Alzheimer’s disease, not as a set of isolated conditions. Their case is that prevention, medicines, testing, workplace design, and access to care have to be connected, because daily behaviors such as sleep, exercise, food, stress reduction, and social connection can shape risk and may strengthen medical treatment rather than compete with it.
Gut-Brain Research Is Recasting Parkinson’s, GLP-1s, and Microbiome Care
At an Aspen Ideas: Health live recording of Science Friday, gastroenterologists Trisha Pasricha and Emeran Mayer argued that the gut-brain connection is not a wellness slogan or a simple two-way pipe between organs. They described a broader brain-gut-microbiome system in which the enteric nervous system, vagus nerve, microbes, immune signaling, hormones, diet and stress interact — a model they said is reshaping how clinicians think about Parkinson’s disease, GLP-1 drugs, mental health, probiotics and early-life development.
Open-Ended Play Helps Adults Learn Without Fixed Hierarchies
In an Aspen Ideas: Health workshop built around Rigamajig, toy inventor and playground designer Cas Holman argues that play is not a break from serious learning but a way to practice uncertainty, collaboration, and problem-solving without fear of failure. Her case is aimed as much at adults as children: open-ended materials and constraints, she says, can loosen hierarchy, invite different forms of intelligence, and help people act before they overplan.
Feel Beit Sustains Israeli-Palestinian Artistic Partnership Through Wartime Grief
At the Aspen Ideas Festival, Feel Beit co-directors Riman Barakat and Karen Brunwasser described how their Israeli-Palestinian cultural center in Jerusalem nearly fractured after October 7, then recommitted to partnership by making room for grief, anger and fear rather than trying to smooth them away. Their case was that art cannot resolve the political conflict, but can create a shared space where Israelis and Palestinians keep enough trust, beauty and human contact alive to mourn, disagree and work together.
Soccer’s Democratic Promise Depends on Who Gets to Play
At an Aspen Ideas Festival session tied to the Aspen Institute and LACMA’s “Why We Play” project, Tom Farrey framed soccer as civic infrastructure: a game that can shape identity, trust, diplomacy, gender opportunity and economic life. Carolyn Blodgett, Betsey Stevenson and Glenn Kaino extended the case, arguing that those benefits do not flow from soccer automatically. They depend on the institutions around the game — schools, fields, transport, Title IX, team culture and affordability — and can disappear when access is captured by families able to pay for it.
U.S. Nuclear Deterrence Faces a Two-Superpower Stress Test
At the Aspen Ideas Festival, Gillian Tett led a panel on whether mutually assured destruction can still stabilize a nuclear order no longer defined by a U.S.-Soviet rivalry. Christine Wormuth argued that the collapse of arms-control limits and China’s buildup have made this the most dangerous period of her national security career; Matthew Kroenig said the United States needs more nuclear capacity to deter Russia and China at once; and Jane Harman warned that weapons modernization without political strategy could deepen the risks it is meant to contain.
Colleges Must Prove Their Value Program by Program
College can still be a route to the American Dream, but higher education leaders Pascale Charlot, Ted Mitchell, Josh Wyner and Matthew Gianneschi argued that institutions now have to prove that promise through completion, affordability and post-graduation value. Their case is that declining public trust will not be answered by prestige or average wage premiums, but by clearer evidence that colleges help students finish, manage cost, connect degrees to viable work and sustain the civic and human learning they claim to provide.
Five Chords Turn Personal Stories Into Musical Scores
At the Aspen Ideas Festival, pianist Harold O’Neal led a workshop arguing that music can be used as a practical language for framing experience, even by people with no formal musical training. O’Neal reduced harmony to five felt energies — rising, grounded, condensed, chaotic and floating — and asked participants to map them onto short personal stories. His broader claim was that conflict, ambiguity and interpretation are not obstacles to storytelling but part of how people give meaning to what happened.
The Colorado River Is Overdrawn From Snowpack to Delta
National Geographic photographer and filmmaker Pete McBride uses Witness to Water to argue that the Colorado River’s crisis is already visible across the basin, from diminished snowpack near Aspen to mud and cracked earth in the Sonoran Desert delta. Following the river through reservoirs, canyons, farms, cities and tribal lands, McBride presents it as an overdrawn system asked to supply drinking water, crops, hydropower, recreation and habitat beyond what a hotter, drier watershed can reliably provide. His case for hope is conditional: restoration and compromise are possible, but only if water users demand less and work at the scale of the river’s losses.
A Nonfiction Book Begins With Reader, Frame, Authority, and Timing
In an Aspen Ideas Festival workshop, Anne Amienne argues that a nonfiction book begins not with a credential or subject area, but with a specific reader and a frame that gives the material motion. Her method asks prospective authors to turn expertise or lived experience into a clear book concept by testing what the reader needs, why the book matters now, and why the writer has the authority to write it. The goal is not a finished proposal, but a sharper idea that can survive contact with readers, agents, and editors.
Joy Can Survive Uncertainty Without Turning Loss Into Gain
At a live taping of The Happiness Lab at the Aspen Ideas Festival, Kate Bowler, the Duke religious historian and author of Joyful, Anyway, argued that joy is not the payoff for suffering well or getting life under control. In conversation with Yale psychologist Laurie Santos, Bowler rejected the cultural pressure to turn loss into growth, gratitude or self-improvement, making the case that joy can survive alongside grief, uncertainty and unfinishedness precisely because it does not require denial.
Universities Serve Democracy Through Disagreement, Access, and Self-Governance
Princeton president and constitutional law scholar Christopher Eisgruber argues that American universities are being judged too often by their most visible conflicts rather than by their central work: teaching students to argue, learn and govern themselves under academic norms. In an Aspen Ideas Festival conversation with Daniel Porterfield, Eisgruber defends universities as democratic institutions that advance free speech and equality together, broaden access to talent, and require autonomy from political, donor and administrative pressure. His case is not that universities avoid failure, but that their value lies in disciplined disagreement, principled self-governance and opportunity widened beyond traditional pipelines.
Playful Connection, Not Passive Leisure, Makes Free Time Restorative
At the Aspen Ideas Festival, Catherine Price, Elizabeth Dunn, and Laurie Santos made the case that fun is not a frivolous reward for finishing serious work but a condition for sustaining it. Drawing on psychology and behavioral science, they argued that adults lose fun when overwork, phones, passive leisure, and performance pressure crowd out the playfulness, connection, and absorbed attention that make life feel energizing. Price defined fun as playful, connected flow; Dunn’s research added that social time, active leisure, and protected time affluence are central to a genuinely good day.
Health Work Requires Contact Across Disciplines and Institutions
In its 2026 closing video, Aspen Ideas: Health presents the gathering as a case for health work that crosses disciplines, institutions, and assumptions. The Aspen Institute frames the June event not as a forum built around one profession or answer, but as a community whose value comes from participants meeting unfamiliar people, testing ideas outside their usual settings, and carrying new connections back to patients, research, teams, and communities.
U.S. Anti-Liberalism and Retrenchment Are Weakening the Postwar Order
Foreign policy analyst Robert Kagan argues that the United States is not simply declining but voluntarily abandoning the liberal principles and global commitments that gave its power strategic purpose. In a live Aspen Ideas Festival conversation with former national security officials Jake Sullivan and Jon Finer, Kagan links America’s retrenchment abroad to an anti-liberal turn at home, warning that the result could be a more unstable multipolar world and a domestic test over whether the country still believes in the Declaration’s universal claims.
Patient Stories Expose Medicine’s Failure to Hear Illness
Patients in the discussion described arriving in medicine through identities already waiting for them: anxious woman, easygoing patient, bad patient, racialized risk, redemptive survivor. Meghan O’Rourke, Jonathan Gleason and Walela Nehanda argue that patient stories matter because they contest those imposed narratives and reveal what clinical categories can miss. The piece makes the case that patient testimony can expose diagnostic uncertainty, racism and structural neglect, but that listening requires time, resources and systems capable of receiving what patients know.
Environment Design Beats Willpower in Closing the Intention-Behavior Gap
Psychologist Beth Cabrera argues that the usual language of discipline and willpower misunderstands why people struggle to live healthier lives. Drawing on her forthcoming book, Being Well, she makes the case that the gap between intention and behavior is better closed by designing environments, routines, and social conditions that make good habits rewarding in the present. Positive emotion, self-compassion, social support, and small sources of agency are not ancillary to well-being, she argues, but part of what makes healthier behavior sustainable.
A Good Death Requires Specific Wishes and People Who Show Up
Death doula and cultural anthropologist Darnell Walker and comedian Tig Notaro argue that death should make ordinary life more deliberate, not more abstract. In a conversation at Aspen Ideas: Health, Walker describes end-of-life care as presence, planning, honesty and witness, while Notaro draws on the final year and death of poet Andrea Gibson, the subject of Come See Me in the Good Light, to show how humor, community and small daily attachments can shape a good goodbye.
Modern Indoor Life Has Replaced Sunlight With a Narrower Light Diet
Rowan Jacobsen argues that modern indoor life has stripped away much of the broad, intense light spectrum humans historically received outdoors, leaving people not just with less brightness but with a different “light diet.” His case is that sunlight should be understood as a dose-dependent biological input—ultraviolet, visible and infrared wavelengths acting through different mechanisms—rather than only as a skin-cancer risk or a source of vitamin D. He does not dismiss that risk, especially burns and susceptible skin types, but argues the larger public-health question is how to restore moderate, regular outdoor light without treating sun exposure as harmless.
Pandemic Preparedness Is Being Built and Dismantled at Once
At Aspen Ideas: Health, Blythe Adamson, Ashish Jha, John Nkengasong and Jessica Malaty Rivera argued that the world is still not ready for the next fast-moving infectious threat, even as WHO members negotiate the first legally binding pandemic agreement. Their case was that preparedness now depends as much on early detection, engineered-biology safeguards, regional response capacity, trusted communication and global financing as on vaccines and stockpiles — and that several of those systems are being weakened at the same time they are supposed to be built.
Psychedelic Therapies Near Approval Before Care Systems Are Ready
Rachel Yehuda of Mount Sinai and Matthew Zorn of HHS argue that the arrival of prescription psychedelic therapies will turn less on the drugs alone than on the clinical systems built around them. In a discussion at Aspen Ideas: Health moderated by William Brangham, they describe a field nearing FDA review while still facing unresolved questions about evidence, training, reimbursement, patient selection and the risk that approval is mistaken for a general green light.
Gut-Brain Signaling Is Reshaping Models of Parkinson’s and Chronic Disease
Gastroenterologist Trisha Pasricha and brain-gut researcher Emeran Mayer argue that the gut should be understood as an active nervous, hormonal, microbial, and immune system in continuous communication with the brain, not as digestive plumbing. In a live Science Friday discussion at Aspen Ideas: Health, they make the case that this bidirectional system may reshape how clinicians think about Parkinson’s disease, GLP-1 drugs, diet, mental health, and early-life development, while warning that much of the consumer “gut health” market has moved faster than the evidence.
Dying Clarifies What the Living Should Stop Postponing
Death doula and cultural anthropologist Darnell Walker and comedian Tig Notaro argue that dying clarifies life less through grand revelation than through specific acts of presence: saying what needs to be said, making plans, laughing when grief allows, and staying with people at the end. In an Aspen Ideas: Health conversation rooted in Notaro’s documentary about poet Andrea Gibson’s final year, they describe death care as practical, relational work that families often already do, whether or not they have a name for it.
Nutrition Advice Shifts From Nutrient Targets to Minimally Processed Foods
At Aspen Ideas: Health, NPR’s Allison Aubrey moderated a nutrition panel with Jessica Knurick, Ty Beal, and Dariush Mozaffarian that argued the clearest dietary advice is also the hardest to implement: eat mostly whole or minimally processed foods, and change the food environment so that choice is easier. The speakers treated fights over seed oils, protein, saturated fat, alcohol, glucose spikes, and plant-based labels as real but often secondary to the larger questions of ultra-processed foods, school-meal infrastructure, food access, and policy incentives.
Feeling Good Can Close the Gap Between Health Intentions and Habits
Psychologist Beth Cabrera argues in her forthcoming book, “Being Well: A Positive Path to a Healthier, Happier You,” that the main obstacle to better health is not ignorance but the gap between intention and action. In a conversation with Elizabeth Cohen, Cabrera makes the case that lasting behavior change depends less on discipline and guilt than on designing daily environments, relationships, and routines so that healthy choices feel rewarding and become easier to repeat.
Bowel Habits Are a Daily Signal of Gut and Nervous-System Health
Gastroenterologist Trish Pasricha argues that bowel habits are a meaningful health signal, not a taboo subject or a once-a-day performance target. In a conversation with John Torres based on her book, You’ve Been Pooping All Wrong, she makes the case that people should know their own baseline, pay attention to changes, and treat stool form, effort, timing, diet, posture, and pelvic-floor mechanics as clinically relevant rather than embarrassing.
South Texas Cities Test Blue Zones Prevention at Million-Person Scale
Methodist Healthcare Ministries chief executive Jaime Wesolowski and Blue Zones founder Dan Buettner argue that South Texas can become a large-scale test of longevity work built around prevention rather than clinical care. In a session at Aspen Ideas: Health, they described a potential seven-city Rio Grande Valley effort that would use local institutions, city policy, food environments, walkability, faith groups and social networks to make healthier daily choices easier for roughly 1mn people. Their case is that the region’s severe chronic-disease burdens coexist with cultural assets — family, faith, connection and traditional foodways — that could be amplified rather than replaced.
AI and Biotech Convergence Makes Governance the Central Health Challenge
Futurist Jamie Metzl, author of Superconvergence, argues that AI, genetics, biotechnology and related fields are no longer separate revolutions but a compounding system giving humans the ability to read, write and alter life itself. In his Aspen Ideas: Health talk, Metzl says those powers could extend healthier lives and remake medicine, food, materials and research, but only if institutions and individuals put governance and values ahead of technological capability.
Psychedelic Medicine’s Main Challenge Is Delivery, Not Drug Approval
At Aspen Ideas: Health, trauma researcher Rachel Yehuda and federal health adviser Matthew Zorn argued that the central question for psychedelic medicine is not simply whether compounds such as MDMA and psilocybin can win approval, but what kind of treatment they would become. Yehuda cautioned that the molecule alone is not the intervention: preparation, setting, trained clinicians and integration may be essential to both safety and benefit. Zorn said federal momentum could move the field toward medical use, but approval would leave unresolved the harder problems of delivery, coverage, evidence and access.
ARPA-H and XPRIZE Push Longevity Science Toward Measurable Function
Alicia Jackson of ARPA-H and Jamie Justice of XPRIZE argue that longevity science should be judged less by promises of longer life than by whether it can compress the years people spend in decline. In a discussion moderated by Latif Nasser, they describe two funding models — government milestone funding and outcome-based prizes — meant to force evidence around healthspan interventions before hype or institutional inertia takes over. Both frame the central bet as restoring measurable function in areas such as muscle, cognition and immunity, while testing even radical ideas against predefined standards.
Telehealth Specialists Are Helping Rural Hospitals Reverse Default Transfers
Wellstar Health System and its rural partners argue that the rural care crisis cannot be solved by transferring more patients to urban hospitals or acquiring local facilities. They describe a Digital Care Network that gives rural emergency, inpatient, and ICU teams 24/7 specialist support by telemedicine, allowing many patients who would previously have been transferred to stay in their local hospital. Matt Lyon of Augusta University’s Medical College of Georgia said the mature model has reversed the expected pattern, with about 70% of comparable patients kept locally rather than sent out.
Young Researchers Target Diagnostic and Modeling Bottlenecks in Pediatric Health
At Aspen Ideas: Health, Francis Collins moderated three teenage researchers whose work targets gaps between biological evidence and clinical care. Maya Hammoud described an organoid model linking ASXL3 loss to neuron deficits in neurodevelopmental disorders; Claire Jiang presented a cell model intended to make juvenile idiopathic arthritis easier to study; and Edward Kang argued that AI analysis of retinal images could help refer children for autism or ADHD evaluation earlier, without replacing behavioral diagnosis.
Art Is Moving From Amenity to Measurable Health Intervention
At Aspen Ideas: Health, Jeremy Faust, Jane Golden, Tiffany Ortiz, and David Leventhal made the case that art is increasingly being treated as a health intervention rather than a cultural amenity. Drawing on mural-making in behavioral health, lullaby-writing for stressed parents, and dance for people with Parkinson’s, they argued that artistic practice can change movement, bonding, stress regulation, identity, and community ownership. The discussion also turned on evidence: how to measure these effects rigorously enough for clinicians, insurers, funders, and public systems without reducing the work to a simple dose or stripping it of meaning.
GLP-1s Are Reshaping Consumer Spending and Employer Health Benefits
A panel at Aspen Ideas: Health argued that GLP-1 drugs are becoming an economic force well beyond pharmaceuticals, changing what households buy while forcing employers, insurers, public programs, pharmacy benefit managers and manufacturers to rethink access to expensive chronic-care medicines. PwC’s Ali Furman pointed to spending shifts in groceries, restaurants, apparel and travel; Eli Lilly’s Laura Steele described new direct-to-consumer and employer channels built around demand; and economist Kosali Simon cautioned that the benefits may not show up simply as lower medical costs.
Open-Ended Play Depends on Constraints, Not Unlimited Freedom
Toy designer Cas Holman argues that play is not a break from serious work but a designed condition for learning, collaboration, and problem-solving. In an Aspen Ideas: Health workshop built around her Rigamajig construction system, Holman makes the case for open-ended play: environments with enough constraint to prompt action and enough ambiguity to let children and adults discover what they are making, rather than execute a prescribed outcome.
Communal Singing Reframes Illness as a Shared Practice of Care
At Aspen Ideas: Health, emergency physician and musician Jeremy Faust joined Patrick and Daniel Lazour to make the case behind their cancer musical Night Side Songs: communal singing can turn private illness into shared care. The Lazours argue that patients, caregivers, and clinicians do not need forced optimism or perfect language so much as practices that help them remain present with one another through treatment, grief, remission, and ordinary life.
Politicized Science Policy Threatens America’s Biomedical Research Ecosystem
Former NIH director Elias Zerhouni argues in Disease Knows No Politics that American biomedical strength depends on a political compact now under strain: science can survive political fights only if evidence, peer review, civil-service independence, immigrant talent, and patient trust remain protected. Drawing on his path from Algeria to Johns Hopkins and the NIH, he warns that separate decisions on funding, universities, immigration, drug pricing, and grant rules can combine to weaken the research system that made the United States a biomedical leader.
Supreme Court Health Cases Test Agency Power, State Law, and Citizenship
At an Aspen Ideas: Health panel, Supreme Court advocates Kannon Shanmugam and Jeffrey Fisher, with moderator Margot Sanger-Katz, argued that some of the term’s most consequential health effects are emerging from cases not formally about health care. Disputes over mifepristone, Roundup labels, conversion therapy, birthright citizenship and gun restrictions show the court reallocating power among presidents, agencies, states, juries, doctors and Congress. Their through-line was institutional: when elected branches leave major health questions unresolved, courts increasingly decide who has authority to set the rules.
Brain Health Care Is Moving From Late-Stage Treatment to Early Prevention
At Aspen Ideas: Health, Arianna Huffington, preventive neurologist Richard Isaacson and Bristol Myers Squibb executive Wendy Bartie argued that brain health should be treated as a lifelong continuum, not a late-life dementia problem or a separate mental-health category. Their case was that earlier risk detection, specific daily interventions such as sleep, exercise and nutrition, new medicines, and less fragmented systems of care need to work together. Bartie put the access test bluntly: innovation matters only if people can actually reach it.
Health Care’s Climate Push Moves From Pledges to Accountability
National Academy of Medicine president Victor Dzau and pediatrician Lisa Patel argue that health care’s climate responsibility extends beyond greener buildings to the disease burden, supply chains, procurement, care delivery and community resilience that determine the sector’s footprint. In this Aspen Ideas: Health discussion, they frame climate change as both a growing source of illness and a test of whether hospitals, clinicians and suppliers can make emissions accountability as routine as patient safety.
Healthcare Cases Test Who Controls Agencies, States, Juries, and Courts
At Aspen Ideas: Health, Supreme Court litigators Kannon Shanmugam and Jeffrey Fisher argued that major healthcare disputes before the courts are also fights over institutional authority. In cases involving mifepristone, Roundup, conversion therapy, marijuana and firearms, birthright citizenship, disability services, and vaccine mandates, they framed the central question as who gets the final say when health policy reaches judges: agencies, states, juries, Congress, the president, or the Court itself.
A Serious Longevity Agenda Requires Habits, Social Ties, and System Reform
Bioethicist Ezekiel Emanuel argues that longevity should not mean trying to live as long as possible, but extending healthy, cognitively intact years with evidence-backed habits and fewer illusions about control over aging. In a conversation with Celine Gounder, he separates useful practices — social connection, exercise, sleep, cooking, vaccines and moderation — from wellness products and “maxing” strategies he says lack data. He also argues that individual discipline is not enough without changes to food policy, social infrastructure, indoor air and the fragmented U.S. health system.
Political Control, Not Flat Budgets, Threatens U.S. Science Funding
At a New York post-screening panel for The Endless Frontier, filmmaker Marilyn Ness, immunologist Shruti Naik, journalist Ira Flatow and executive producer Aaron Mertz argued that the most vulnerable part of science is not discovery itself but the public system that sustains it. Their case was that curiosity-driven research, expert peer review and stable federal funding are being misunderstood and politically threatened just as the public needs a clearer view of how science actually produces medicines, technologies and trained researchers. The panel framed science funding as both an institutional question and a democratic one: who decides what research is worth doing, and whether voters understand enough to defend that process.
AI’s Creative Promise Is Moving People From Consumption to Authorship
In a closing reflection at Shared Futures: The AI Forum, Patrick J. McGovern Foundation president Vilas Dhar argued that AI’s creative significance should be judged less by what machines can produce than by whether they help people recover agency as makers. Drawing on performances from the forum and a childhood memory of communal singing in India, Dhar framed the risk as passivity: a culture in which creativity is professionalized, distributed and consumed rather than shared. His cautious optimism was that AI could widen participation if it gives people without technical skills new ways to write, sing, build and imagine.
AI Distrust Makes Human Agency the Central Cultural Question
Opening Shared Futures: The AI Forum, Vivian Schiller of Aspen Digital and Vilas Dhar of the Patrick J. McGovern Foundation argued that public distrust of AI is not an obstacle to the conversation but its starting point. Schiller framed AI as a contested tool that can either feel imposed on people or be used by artists and makers with agency; Dhar said the deeper issue is not the technology itself, but how people turn fear of replacement into meaning, art, and shared experience.
Eleven Collaborations Win $4.5 Million for Community Trust-Building
The Alliance for Social Trust and Allstate present the 2026 Trust in Practice Awards as an effort to fund and publicize trust-building as a practical discipline, not a civic sentiment. Tom Wilson says the awards are meant to show how trust can be designed into community engagement, while awardees describe that work as listening before acting, relying on local knowledge, building culturally accessible relationships, and sustaining repeated acts of connection under real community conditions.
Trust-Building Was Framed as Funded, Measurable Community Work
The 2026 Trust in Practice Summit highlights present trust-building as practical civic work that needs funding, tools, measurement, and local leadership, not simply a sentiment to be restored. Hosted in Chicago by the Alliance for Social Trust in partnership with Allstate, the summit convened more than 250 leaders and announced $1 million, $500,000, and $100,000 awards to 11 nonprofit collaborations across 10 states. Speakers argued that institutions should support community leaders, measure trust at a local level, and focus on the ordinary problem-solving through which trust is built.
AI Works Best When Domain Experts Control Its Use
Josh Tyrangiel’s AI for Good argues that artificial intelligence is most useful when domain experts, not technology companies or models themselves, decide how it is applied. In conversation with Aspen Economic Strategy Group director Melissa S. Kearney, Tyrangiel says his reporting found real gains in healthcare, education, government, and recycling, but mostly as incremental improvements shaped by doctors, teachers, public servants, and other practitioners. His case is not that AI’s risks are overstated, but that the policy question is how to preserve human authority while regulating the most dangerous capabilities.
Richwood Model Brings Post-Flood Volunteerism to 18 Appalachian Communities
Heather Foster and Katie Loudin of the West Virginia Community Development Hub argue that flood recovery in Appalachia should be treated as a chance to build lasting civic capacity, not only to repair damage. Drawing on the Hub’s work in Richwood, West Virginia, and a new Trust in Practice project across 18 flood-impacted communities, they make the case that post-disaster volunteerism can become durable local leadership when residents are supported to set priorities, deliver visible wins, and keep working together after outside relief groups leave.
Parity Homes Proved West Baltimore Demand Before Capital Arrived
Bree Jones, founder and chief executive of Parity Homes, used her Trust in Practice Summit keynote to argue that trust can operate as development infrastructure in neighborhoods damaged by disinvestment. In her account, Parity proved demand in West Baltimore before major capital arrived by using a $100 rendering, repeated conversations and an 800-person waitlist, then turned that social trust into a resident-led housing effort. Jones’s broader claim is that restoring vacant homes in historically Black neighborhoods requires rebuilding residents’ relationships to land, to one another and to collective power.
KABOOM! Tests Playgrounds as Civic Trust Infrastructure in Uvalde
KABOOM! chief executive Lysa Ratliff used a Trust in Practice Summit awardee spotlight to argue that playgrounds can be more than a post-crisis gesture in Uvalde, Texas. She said the organization’s work after the Robb Elementary shooting shifted from building a single playspace to addressing a citywide access gap, with trust built through repeated presence and community-designed projects. Ratliff’s central claim is that joy can be productive: a measurable source of belonging, connection and problem-solving capacity, if KABOOM! and its research partners can prove the effect.
Social Trust Requires People to Extend Trust Before Expecting It
Olajumoke “Jummy” Banjo, senior director of the Alliance for Social Trust at the Aspen Institute, closed the 2026 Trust in Practice Summit by arguing that social trust begins with people willing to extend it before they can expect it in return. In conversation with NPR’s Jenn White, Banjo framed trust-building as long-term, community-embedded work: less a matter of formal programming than of vulnerability, sustained relationships, and commitments whose benefits may not be visible for decades.
Community Relationships, Not Authority, Rebuild Social Trust
Frederick Riley, executive director of Weave: The Social Fabric Project, told the Trust in Practice Summit in Chicago that America’s trust problem is rooted less in disagreement than in the loss of relationships that once contained it. He argued that trust is rebuilt locally, through neighbors, mentors, coaches, business owners, and other “weavers” who create repeated contact and reasons for people to show up for one another. Programs and data can help, Riley said, but they cannot substitute for the relationships through which trust is formed.
Institutional Trust Is Collapsing, but Neighborhood Networks Remain Durable
At the 2026 Trust in Practice Summit, researchers and community leaders argued that America’s trust crisis looks different depending on where it is measured. Justin Blake of the Edelman Trust Institute and Wendy Weiser of the Brennan Center described deep distrust in institutions, elections, and people outside one’s own information circles, while Lydia Prado of Lifespan Local and Frederick Riley of Weave pointed to neighborhoods where trust is still built through proximity, reciprocity, and repair. The panel’s shared case was that local trust is not enough to counter national forces driving division, but democratic renewal is unlikely without it.
Trust-Building Awards Draw $800 Million in Requests for $5 Million Pool
Allstate chief executive Tom Wilson used the 2026 Trust in Practice Summit in Chicago to argue that social trust should be treated as civic infrastructure that can be deliberately built, not as a vague cultural sentiment in decline. Announcing the inaugural Trust in Practice Awardees, Wilson said more than 1,600 proposals sought $800mn from a $5mn pool, evidence that community organizations are already trying to repair trust at scale but lack resources. The awards, he said, are intended to support and learn from local efforts that build trust through repeated action, shared purpose and relationships.
Trust-Building Is Cast as a Practice Learned Through Community Action
Vivian Schiller and Dan Porterfield opened the 2026 Trust in Practice Summit by framing social trust as work to be learned from practitioners, not simply a theme for discussion. Schiller described the Chicago gathering as a convening built around participation and exchange, while Porterfield tied the effort to the Aspen Institute’s postwar tradition of using dialogue to build understanding and spur action. Their central case was that Aspen and Allstate can help connect communities already rebuilding trust into a broader learning network.
Employee Ownership Needs Institutional-Grade Structures to Attract Scaled Capital
A panel at the Aspen Institute’s 2026 Employee Ownership Ideas Forum argues that employee ownership is beginning to attract institutional interest, but still lacks the market infrastructure allocators need before committing capital at scale. Regina Carls of JPMorganChase, Chavon Sutton of Cambridge Associates, Jim Sorenson of the Sorenson Impact Foundation, and Emily Thomas of Morgan Stanley frame the opportunity as a financeable ownership-transition market — not simply a values-based cause. Their central case is that growth will depend on clearer structures, stronger managers, performance evidence, and regulatory confidence rather than broader enthusiasm alone.
Employee Ownership Requires Workplace Practices, Not Just Equity Grants
At the 2026 Employee Ownership Ideas Forum, Adria Scharf moderated a panel arguing that employee ownership does not produce better jobs or stronger companies simply because workers receive shares or an ownership plan is created. Evan Edwards, Melissa Hoover, Chris Mackin and Anna-Lisa Miller made the case that ownership has to be built into workplace culture through information sharing, job quality, management practice, governance and accountability. Their shared contention was that the field’s business case depends on making ownership credible in daily operations, not treating it as a transaction or communications campaign.
Five Proposals Target the Scaling Bottlenecks in Employee Ownership
At the Aspen Institute’s 2026 Employee Ownership Ideas Forum, five speakers argued that expanding employee ownership is less a matter of promoting a single model than building the institutions that let ownership endure and scale. Sara Horowitz, Esteban Kelly, Sean-Tamba Matthew, Ginny Vanderslice, and Felipe Witchger each identified a different bottleneck — from weak membership structures and bespoke co-op development to seller-exit barriers, neglected ownership culture, and risk-averse capital.
States Test Financing and Training Models to Expand Employee Ownership
At the Aspen Institute’s 2026 Employee Ownership Ideas Forum, Iowa state Rep. Shannon Lundgren, New Jersey state Sen. Andrew Zwicker and the Department of Labor’s Hilary Abell argued that states are becoming the main testing ground for expanding employee ownership. Their case was practical rather than theoretical: states can help owners and workers navigate outreach, feasibility studies, financing and post-transition education, while Washington funds, convenes and learns from those experiments without imposing a single model.
Employee Ownership Gives Workers Voice Before It Builds Wealth
At the Aspen Institute’s 2026 Employee Ownership Ideas Forum, employee owners from Equal Exchange, Advisors for Change and Lewis Tree Services argued that ownership changes work first by changing workers’ agency, not simply their compensation. Nicole Vitello, Krystal Thompson and Charlie Arrindell described different models — a mature worker cooperative, a newer remote co-op and a large ESOP — but made a common case: employee ownership requires transparency, training and participation if workers are to have a real claim on the enterprise they help build.
Employee Ownership Should Advance Through Tax Simplification, Not New Carve-Outs
US Senator Ron Johnson used a keynote at the 2026 Employee Ownership Ideas Forum to argue that employee ownership belongs inside a broader effort to reduce capital concentration and put more productive assets in the hands of ordinary Americans. Johnson supported ESOPs when they reward workers who helped build a business, but warned against treating them as another narrow tax carve-out. His larger case was for a simpler tax code that taxes business income at the ownership level, preserves “wherewithal to pay,” and makes employee succession a more viable alternative to consolidation or private-equity sales.
Employee Ownership Field Needs Shared Infrastructure to Build Demand
Loren Rodgers, executive director of the National Center for Employee Ownership, used his keynote at Aspen’s 2026 Employee Ownership Ideas Forum to argue that the employee ownership field needs a staffed consortium, not another standalone organization. Rodgers said existing groups are duplicating work, missing referrals, and presenting a fragmented face to business owners; his proposal is to coordinate events, research, communications, and demand-building across ESOPs, worker cooperatives, employee ownership trusts, and other broad-based ownership models.
Employee Ownership Advocates Urged to Reject the Niche Label
Paula D’Ambrosa, Prudential Financial’s director of inclusive wealth-building, opened the second day of the 2026 Employee Ownership Ideas Forum by arguing that employee ownership should be understood as a longstanding American answer to who shares in economic growth. Drawing on a Revolutionary-era profit-sharing requirement for cod-fishing subsidies, she said the field should stop describing itself as niche and instead present employee ownership as a mainstream way for workers to share in the value they create, including as artificial intelligence reshapes the economy.
Employee Ownership Is Framed as a Mechanism for Sharing AI Productivity Gains
Aspen Institute’s Maureen Conway and Rutgers University’s William Castellano opened the 2026 Employee Ownership Ideas Forum by arguing that employee ownership should be treated as a practical response to economic insecurity and technological disruption, not just a fairness principle. Conway framed broad-based ownership as a way to give workers voice, wealth-building opportunities, and a stake in the value they help create, while Castellano tied it to AI-era management challenges, arguing that productivity gains from new technologies should be shared with employees through ownership, incentives, and workforce investment.
Employee Ownership Gave a Local Hardware Chain Its Succession Plan
Gina Schaefer, founder and co-owner of A Few Cool Hardware Stores, used her keynote at the 2026 Employee Ownership Ideas Forum to present employee ownership as a succession strategy for community-rooted businesses. After building a 14-store hardware company in the Washington region, Schaefer said selling to employees through an ESOP was a way to preserve the company’s culture, reward the workers who built it, and keep ownership tied to the communities the stores serve.
Federal Policy Should Make Partial ESOPs Work for Larger Employers
Danny Massey, head of strategy and communications for Expanding ESOPs, argues that employee ownership should be treated as a federal wealth-building policy, not mainly as a succession tool for small private companies. In a keynote at the 2026 Employee Ownership Ideas Forum, Massey says ESOPs have proved they can raise worker wealth and job quality, but their reach remains too narrow. His central case is that policy must make partial ESOPs viable for larger companies if broad-based ownership is to reach millions of workers rather than hundreds of firms a year.
ESOP Valuation Safe Harbor Bill Awaits Final House Action
Sen. Tim Kaine used his keynote at the 2026 Employee Ownership Ideas Forum to press the House to pass the Retire Through Ownership Act, a bipartisan ESOP bill he said would reduce uncertainty around company valuations. Kaine argued the measure would create a safe harbor for sellers who use existing IRS rules when selling to an employee stock ownership plan, protecting legitimate transactions from later challenges over whether workers were left carrying excessive debt.
Employee Ownership Could Prevent a Baby-Boomer Business Closure Wave
Bharat Ramamurti, the former deputy director of the National Economic Council, used a keynote at the 2026 Employee Ownership Ideas Forum to argue that employee ownership is an unusually low-tradeoff policy response to a looming wave of small-business succession. He warned that millions of baby-boomer-owned firms employing tens of millions of Americans could close as owners retire, with particular risks for rural communities and essential sectors. Ramamurti said federal policy should make worker buyouts easier through financing, transaction support, and tax advantages for owners who sell to employees.
Congress and Labor Department Action Could Remove Key Barriers to ESOP Formation
Jim Bonham, president and CEO of The ESOP Association, used his keynote at the 2026 Employee Ownership Ideas Forum to argue that ESOPs are entering their most important policy opening in decades. He said advocates must use that window to pass valuation legislation, shape Department of Labor rules, and ensure ESOPs are part of coming debates over AI, tax policy, and business succession — while defending the specific legal features that distinguish ESOPs from broader claims of employee ownership.
Employee Ownership Offers a Succession Path for Small Businesses
JPMorganChase philanthropy officer Gwyneth Galbraith used her closing remarks at the 2026 Employee Ownership Ideas Forum to argue that employee ownership should be treated as part of the mainstream small-business succession and economic-opportunity agenda. Galbraith said the model can help owners address transaction value, job preservation, and mission continuity at once, but scaling it will require more advisory capacity, capital, policy attention, and visibility among business owners.
Employee Ownership Needs Institutional Capital Channels to Reach Scale
Margot Brandenburg, a senior program officer for mission investments at the Ford Foundation, used her keynote at the 2026 Employee Ownership Ideas Forum to argue that employee ownership fits Ford’s social justice mission and its investment mandate. She made the case on three fronts: ownership can build worker wealth and voice, economic distribution matters for democracy, and research on ESOP productivity gains gives institutional investors a financial reason to pay attention. Scaling the field, she said, will require the fund managers and intermediaries that can move large pools of capital into employee-owned companies.
Employee Ownership’s Bottleneck Is Owner Awareness, Not Just Capital
Phil Reeves, founder and managing partner of Apis & Heritage, used his keynote at the 2026 Employee Ownership Ideas Forum to argue that employee ownership’s main constraint is not just capital, regulation, or transaction design, but demand among business owners. Reeves said the field must make employee ownership visible and credible to lower-middle-market sellers before they choose another exit path, while keeping the measure of success on whether workers gain meaningful wealth and agency.
The Aspen Institute Frames Leadership as Dialogue Across Difference
In a 75th-anniversary institutional statement, the Aspen Institute presents leadership as a discipline of listening, convening and acting across difference. Its executives argue that progress begins with people: dialogue builds common ground and trust, and that trust can be turned toward work on economic opportunity, energy and climate challenges, institutions and rising generations. President and chief executive Dan Porterfield closes the case as an invitation to “ignite human potential” and create new possibilities for a better world.
Older-Adult Nutrition Needs Medical Evidence and Community Infrastructure
Food & Society at the Aspen Institute and the National Association of Nutrition and Aging Services Programs convened Robert Blancato, Kathleen Graim and Patrick Stover to argue that older-adult nutrition should be treated as health infrastructure, not just emergency food aid. Their case is that effective interventions must account for changing physiology, chronic disease, isolation, mobility, mental health and home conditions, while producing the evidence and reimbursement pathways policymakers require. The discussion places the Older Americans Act, medically tailored meals, dietitians and community-based delivery at the center of that agenda.
Trust in Practice Awards Fund 11 Local Trust-Building Collaborations
The 2026 Trust in Practice Summit, convened in Chicago by the Alliance for Social Trust with the Aspen Institute and Allstate, presented trust-building as practical local work that requires funding, measurement, institutional listening and community relationships. Speakers including Daniel Porterfield, Tom Wilson and others argued that pluralism and institutional trust depend less on national messaging than on leaders embedded in communities, while the summit’s awards and Trust Map were offered as tools to support that work.
Aspen Institute Marks 75 Years of Humanistic Convening
Todd Breyfogle presents the Aspen Institute’s 75th anniversary as evidence of continuity rather than reinvention. Founded in 1949 by Walter and Elizabeth Paepcke amid postwar and early nuclear anxieties, the Institute is described as a humanistic project built on the idea that leaders need time, space, and rigorous dialogue before they can act well. Breyfogle argues that the same premise now underlies Aspen’s global network of programs, fellowships, and convenings.
Roaring Fork Valley Health Agenda Centers Access, Longevity, and Rural Care
Aspen Institute Vice President Ruth Katz and Aspen Valley Health CEO Richard Becker argue that this summer’s Aspen Ideas: Health programming should connect national debates over longevity, rural care, AI and wearables to the practical health needs of the Roaring Fork Valley. Becker’s central case is that rural health innovation should be judged by whether it broadens access, reduces fragmentation and keeps a diverse local population healthier, rather than by whether it delivers new tools only to those already best positioned to use them.
Pope Leo XIV Frames AI Governance as a Test of Human Dignity
Pope Leo XIV’s first encyclical, Magnifica Humanitas, argues that artificial intelligence should be judged first by its effects on human dignity, agency and power, not by its technical promise. In a panel moderated by Vivian Schiller, Vilas Dhar, Kim Daniels and Josh Good read the document as an effort to bring Catholic social teaching into AI debates over work, education, autonomous weapons, institutional accountability and the moral limits of markets and technology.
SNAP Purchase Restrictions Are Creating Checkout Confusion, Not Clearer Nutrition
In a Food & Society at the Aspen Institute and Global Food Institute webinar on SNAP purchase restrictions, practitioners argued that the policies are being experienced less as nutrition guidance than as a patchwork of checkout-line denials. Propel’s Justin King, Feeding Texas’s Celia Cole, Restore OKC’s Rachel Newman and NACS’s Margaret Mannion said state-by-state rules are confusing recipients, burdening small retailers and driving substitutions or cash purchases rather than clear evidence of healthier diets. Their practical alternative was to put more weight on access and incentives than prohibition.
Pope Leo XIV’s AI Encyclical Ties Safety Rules to Human Dignity
A panel convened by Aspen Digital treated Pope Leo XIV’s first encyclical, Magnificent Humanity, as an authoritative Catholic intervention in AI governance rather than a narrowly theological text. Kim Daniels, Vilas Dhar, and Josh Good argued that the document judges AI by its effects on human dignity, especially for workers, students, creative professionals, and vulnerable communities, while pointing to safety regulation, retraining, and education as practical tests. The unresolved problem, Daniels said, is whether the Church can move that teaching from Rome into parishes, civic institutions, classrooms, and technology work.
AZ Plays Aims to Close Arizona’s Youth Team Sports Participation Gap
Boys & Girls Clubs of the Valley announced AZ Plays, a Phoenix effort tied to the Aspen Institute’s Project Play, to study and expand youth-sports access across schools and local partners. Marcia Mintz framed the work as a push to understand and lift up youth sports in the Valley, while Larry Fitzgerald said the urgency is Arizona’s near-bottom national ranking in team-sports participation. Fitzgerald and other speakers argued that access to play is not only a sports issue, but a route to mentorship, discipline, confidence, and leadership for children.
Work Alone Leaves 42% of U.S. Households Below Survival Budgets
Stephanie Hoopes of United For ALICE said 42% of U.S. households were below the group’s conservative survival threshold in 2023, including many families above the federal poverty line but unable to cover basic costs. In a May 2026 discussion hosted by the Aspen Institute Economic Opportunities Program and United For ALICE, speakers argued that this makes hardship among working households a job-quality and affordability problem, not simply a poverty problem. They presented ALICE at Work as an employer-focused effort to use local data and peer cohorts to change the workplace practices that affect income, costs, stability, and advancement.
ESPN Opens $10,000 Grant Round for Youth Sports Innovation
ESPN’s Jennifer Paulett used the Project Play Summit 2026 to frame Take Back Sports as a participation-first youth sports initiative, arguing that the goal is more children playing in safe, positive environments rather than a pipeline for elite athletes. Paulett said ESPN and Disney will open a second round of the Take Back Sports Innovation Challenge, offering $10,000 grants to summit organizations with 30 days to apply.
Youth Sports Campaign Targets Coach Training to Reduce Early Dropout
DICK’S Sporting Goods Foundation and GameChanger are using their Most Valuable Coach announcement to argue that youth sports retention depends heavily on the adults leading teams. Rick Jordan of the foundation and Rebecca Wasserman of GameChanger frame the campaign around a coaching gap: children are more likely to keep playing when coaches are trained to create safe, predictable and supportive environments. The effort positions healing-centered coaching as practical sideline behavior, not therapy, with resources aimed at volunteer coaches who shape whether children stay in the game.
U.S. Soccer Plans School-Based Push to Close Youth Access Gaps
Project Play’s national roundtable members argued that raising youth sports participation to 63% by 2030 will require schools and after-school programs to become a larger delivery system, not simply more club recruitment. Lex Chalat of U.S. Soccer’s Soccer Forward Foundation positioned Soccer at Schools as a legacy strategy tied to the 2026 World Cup, LA28 and the Women’s World Cup, while Bank of America’s Cindy Nguyen Thomas and Massachusetts Youth Soccer’s Rob Holliday described corporate, state and local roles in turning national attention into affordable access.
63x30 Adds Community Sports Model Reaching 600,000 Children a Year
Project Play’s 63x30 discussion on communities presents Boys & Girls Clubs of America and Buffalo Wild Wings’ All-Stars partnership as a scalable way to make youth sports accessible beyond schools and pay-to-play systems. Jim Clark of BGCA and Stuart Brown of the Inspire Brands Foundation argue that long-term funding for uniforms, equipment, trained staff and league costs can turn community clubs into reliable sports settings for hundreds of thousands of children, with benefits they tie to physical health, mental health and broader youth development.
Champion Athletes Can Open Doors, but Students Must Lead
Tim Brown, the Heisman Trophy winner and Pro Football Hall of Famer, argues that athlete leadership matters only when it is close enough for young people to trust and carry themselves. In a conversation moderated by Binta Niambi Brown, he makes the case that high-profile athletes can serve as mentors and resources, but lasting youth leadership has to be built inside schools, teams, and neighborhoods rather than delivered from outside. His examples—from his mother, Howie Long, Lou Holtz, and current college football—frame leadership as structure, belief, presence, and transmission.
Youth Sports Participation Rebounds, but 63% Goal Requires System Change
At an Aspen Institute Sports & Society Program session on the 63x30 challenge, Ashleigh Huffman said youth sports participation has rebounded from its COVID-era low but remains constrained by a system built to “weed folks out.” Rick Jordan of the DICK’S Sporting Goods Foundation and Steve Tanner of PGA of America argued that reaching 63% participation by 2030 will require more than new programs: longer community investments, coordinated sport pathways, practical access to facilities and equipment, and coaches who make children want to return.
The Athlete-Artist Divide Narrows Youth Development Too Early
LJ Rader, founder of Art But Make It Sports, argues that children are pushed too early to choose between identities such as athlete and artist, and lose developmental range in the process. In a conversation moderated by LACMA curator Britt Salvesen, Rader uses his art-and-sports image pairings to make the case that both fields train attention, emotion, improvisation and tolerance for beginnerhood. Their shared point is practical rather than romantic: young people benefit when they are allowed to keep playing across more than one kind of practice.
Youth Sports Safety Reform Needs National Standards and Dedicated Funding
At Project Play Summit 2026, Benita Fitzgerald-Mosley of the U.S. Center for SafeSport and Seth Lieberman of Ankored argued that youth sports safety has become a governance problem as much as a cultural one. Parents increasingly expect background checks, abuse-prevention training and injury safeguards, but the speakers said today’s system is fragmented, underfunded and outside SafeSport’s reach for much of grassroots sport. The reform case is for common standards, portable credentials, dedicated funding and a stronger central safety infrastructure by 2028.
Youth Sports Have Proven ACL Prevention Tools but Rarely Use Them
Aspen Institute moderator Vince Minjares and sports-medicine physicians Cindy Chang and Ryan Lingor argue that youth sports already have proven tools to reduce many ACL injuries, but schools, clubs and leagues are not using them consistently. Drawing on the National ACL Injury Coalition’s work with Hospital for Special Surgery, they frame the problem as an implementation failure: neuromuscular training, strength work and better movement development need to be built into ordinary practice, especially for girls in cutting and landing sports.
Student Captains Are Turning Team Leadership Into Civic Advocacy
At a Heisman Foundation discussion moderated by CEO Jeff Price, high school captains Guywintz Jules, Ma’Net Richardson and Carol Yan argued that student-athlete leadership already extends beyond team performance into civic work. They described captaincy as a way to identify needs, press adults for resources and create access, whether through a Salem youth commission, advocacy for a first-year flag football team or a student-run golf program. The case they made for future leadership development was practical: give young captains mentors and access, but do not take the work out of their hands.
Youth Sport Reform Is Shifting From Programs to Children’s Rights Standards
Tom Farrey of the Aspen Institute, USA Volleyball chair Cassidy Lichtman, and Deloitte’s Mariam Mansury argue that U.S. youth sport needs new defaults, not just new programs. Using Norway’s child-first sport system, USA Volleyball’s development work, and city adoption of the Children’s Bill of Rights in Sports, they make the case for treating youth sport as an ecosystem governed by minimum standards around access, safety, coaching quality, developmentally appropriate play, and joy.
Youth Sports AI Needs Guardrails Before Children Become Data Points
Zarif Haque of The Good Game, Travis Roache, author of Coaching in the Age of AI, and Calli Schroeder of the Electronic Privacy Information Center argue that AI can widen access to coaching and reduce administrative burdens in youth sports, but only if adults keep it subordinate to human judgment. Their central warning is that tools built to track, rank, or predict children can turn play into surveillance and optimization, undermining privacy, development, and the human relationships that make youth sports worth protecting.
Boys Still Want Sports, but the Participation Supply Has Shrunk
The Aspen Institute and the American Institute for Boys and Men argue that declining or stagnant boys’ sports participation is not mainly a demand problem: boys still want to play, but too many are shut out by narrow team models, early specialization, performance pressure and underprepared adult support. Alanna Williams and Zach Moo Young frame the policy response as expanding the supply of lower-pressure, developmentally appropriate opportunities without reducing girls’ access. Charlie Ward adds a coach’s case for flexibility, arguing that programs need to make room for boys whose contributions do not fit standard roster logic.
A $40 Billion Youth Sports Market Lacks Basic Child Safeguards
Tom Farrey of the Aspen Institute’s Sports & Society Program argues that youth sports need a basic governance layer if they are to deliver on their civic and developmental promise. In a conversation moderated by Chuck Todd, Farrey makes the case for registration, safety standards, abuse reporting, school-based support and a children’s rights framework, while Todd frames youth sports as one of the few remaining local institutions that still brings divided communities together. Their shared premise is that more participation is not enough if the system remains privatized, fragmented and weakly accountable.
Private Capital’s Youth-Sports Promise Depends on Local Access and Accountability
Private capital can make youth sports more local and accessible only if it is tied to participation, data rights and enforceable standards, according to Jay Adya of Elysian Park Ventures; Katherine Van Dyck of the American Economic Liberties Project argues that the same investment machinery can just as easily produce lock-in and extraction. Their dispute turns on whether league partnerships and better-designed business models can discipline investors, or whether youth sports needs antitrust enforcement and legal accountability to prevent profit-driven systems from capturing families.
Heisman Backs National Leadership Academy for High School Team Captains
Dan Reed, chair of the Heisman Foundation, announced the Aspen Institute’s Captains Leadership Academy as a national effort to turn high school sports captains into broader civic leaders. Reed said Heisman is making the largest single grant in its history as founding partner, arguing that students already chosen to lead teams can be trained, mentored and supported to lead in schools and communities. Pete Weber of the Aspen Institute placed the academy within a wider push to expand youth leadership development, with IMG Academy also named as a partner.
Boston’s Youth Sports Gap Is Coordination, Not Just Cost
Boston Mayor Michelle Wu argues that building a “city of champions” depends less on Boston’s sports culture than on making youth sports easier for families to find, join, and sustain. In a conversation with Joon Lee, Wu says the city’s role is to coordinate a fragmented network of schools, parks, nonprofits, volunteers, professional teams, and facilities so that cost, information, transportation, registration, and maintenance do not determine which children get to play.
Cost, Transit, and Field Shortages Limit Youth Soccer Access
A new Aspen Institute Sports & Society Program report on youth soccer in New York and New Jersey, discussed by Tom Farrey and philanthropist Laurie Tisch, argues that the region’s central problem is not children’s interest in the game but unequal access to it. Farrey said the report points to cost, transportation, field shortages and gender gaps as the barriers shaping who gets to play, while Tisch said the findings give her philanthropy a roadmap for a $10mn push into local soccer programs, fields and support for girls’ participation.
Twenty Organizations and Schools Named 2026 Project Play Champions
Molly Kaye, Nickelodeon’s senior public affairs manager, used an Aspen Institute Project Play Summit announcement to name 20 organizations and schools as the 2026 Project Play Champions cohort, powered by Nickelodeon Our World. Kaye framed the recognition as a commitment to youth sports that are not only safer and more inclusive, but shaped by children themselves, arguing that kids build agency when they are trusted to choose, collaborate, lead and be heard.
Girls’ Sports Gains Depend on Systems That Prevent Female Athlete Injuries
Kate Ackerman, co-founder and director of the Women’s Health, Sports & Performance Institute, argues that expanding girls’ access to sport is insufficient if the systems around them are not built to keep them healthy. In her Play Talk presentation, she says injury prevention, trained coaches, appropriate medical support, nutrition and mental health resources, and faster translation of female-specific research are prerequisites for girls and women to receive the lifelong benefits sports can offer.
Nasal Breathing Gives Coaches a Practical Tool for Stress Regulation
Chi Kim, CEO of Pure Edge Inc., argues that nasal breathing gives coaches and adults around teams a simple way to recognize and regulate stress before it shapes attention, decision-making, and behavior. In her talk, she links pressure to a narrowing of physiological and cognitive capacity, then presents counted breathing through the nose as a route back toward parasympathetic activation and steadier presence. Her point is deliberately practical: before correcting an athlete or reacting to a play, adults should manage the state they bring into the team environment.
Youth Sports Providers Are Missing a $5.7 Billion Afterschool Funding System
Kari Pardoe of the Ralph C. Wilson, Jr. Foundation argues that youth sports providers are missing a major path to growth by treating afterschool as a separate field. Drawing on work in Southeast Michigan and Western New York, she says sports organizations that see themselves as youth development providers can use afterschool networks, training systems, and public funding to reach children who are not already in organized sports.
Civic Learning Is Career Preparation When Students Practice Agency
The Aspen Education & Society Program’s final Redefining Student Engagement session argued that civic learning and career readiness are not competing priorities but overlapping forms of preparation. Elizabeth Zamudio, Elizabeth Clay Roy, Jennifer Tran and Braden Chapman made the case that students develop the skills schools and employers say they value — communication, collaboration, problem-solving, perspective taking and civil disagreement — when they have real agency in schools, supported channels to influence decisions, and families and institutions that treat youth voice as part of civic life.
Anti-Muslim Politics Is Testing the Limits of Religious Liberty
Anti-Muslim politics in the US and UK works by recasting Islam not as a religion but as an ideology, racial threat or civilizational enemy, according to legal scholar Asma Uddin, journalist Hannah Allam and British commentator Fraser Nelson. Uddin argues that this move can push Muslims outside religious-liberty protections; Nelson sees it as a revival of sectarian tribalism dressed in Christian language; and Allam warns that journalism and national-security policy have helped make Muslims a suspect category whose logic now extends to others.
A 500-Square-Mile Colorado District Builds Belonging Through Community Ties
In a Rooted + Rising reflection, Carmen Anarella argues that rural education in South Routt County, Colorado, cannot be understood by the label rural alone. Drawing on Yampa and the Soroco school district, which spans 500 square miles, she describes a school system whose strength comes from long relationships between students, families, teachers, neighbors and alumni. For Anarella, the defining feature is not remoteness but the way the community keeps showing up for young people — in classrooms, at milestones and during emergencies.
Tulsa Youth Leader Says Schools Measure Students More Than Support Them
Komari Crisp presents Tulsa’s Black history, especially Greenwood and Black Wall Street, as a source of identity and power for young people. But she says her school experience often made students feel like numbers, valued most visibly when standardized test scores were at stake rather than consistently supported as people. Crisp points to Tulsa Changemakers and her own Youth Action Coalition as a different model: sustained support that trusts young people to speak, lead, and take part in decisions affecting them.
Rural Schools Have Local Care but Lack Outside Investment
In a Rooted + Rising reflection on rural education in London, Kentucky, Trey Jackson argues that local schools are sustained by unusually dense networks of care but constrained by a lack of outside investment. Jackson describes teachers, coaches, neighbors, and nonprofits as central to students’ lives, while warning that underpaid staff, staffing shortages, and unmet basic needs cannot be solved by community commitment alone. For him, the problem is not that rural communities lack will; it is that their schools are being asked to make care do the work of resources.
Tulsa Youth Organizing Targets the High-School-to-College Gap
In a Rooted + Rising welcome video, Tulsa youth journalist Kamari Crisp frames her work around the transition from high school to college, a gap she says led her to start the Youth Action Coalition. Crisp argues that youth and education in Tulsa cannot be separated from race, culture, inequity and local history, including her own experience at Booker T. Washington High School. She says her reporting will also look for positive stories in the city, holding injustice and local possibility in the same frame.
Eastern Kentucky’s Rural Education Story Starts With Local Experience
Trey Jackson’s Rooted + Rising welcome video introduces him as an Eastern Kentucky youth journalist whose authority comes from having lived and studied in the rural education system he plans to document. Jackson argues that national conversations often overlook his region, and says his work will focus on local institutions he knows directly, including his public high school in London, Kentucky, and the University of the Cumberlands, where he sees people trying to address challenges and build reasons for students and talent to stay.
Low-Wealth Families Need Cash Flow, Seed Capital, and Appreciating Assets
Aspen FSP’s recording argues that the affordability crisis makes wealth building more urgent, not less, because families cannot achieve durable stability on constrained cash flow alone. Joanna Smith-Ramani and Genevieve Melford frame stability and wealth as mutually reinforcing, while leaders from Compass Working Capital, GRO and Stackwell point to programs that combine income support, externally funded capital, trusted guidance and routes into appreciating assets. Their case is that low-wealth households need the same kinds of balance-sheet supports that higher-income families often receive through employer benefits, tax advantages and private wealth.
AI Evaluations Give Philanthropy a Lever Over What Developers Optimize
Aspen Digital’s B Cavello argues that AI evaluations should be understood by philanthropy as a way to shape the AI ecosystem, not merely as technical measurements or benchmark leaderboards. In a briefing for philanthropic leaders convened with Siegel Family Endowment, Cavello says funders can influence what AI developers optimize for, support outside accountability through audits and related tools, and help users judge when systems are appropriate for their needs.