The Aspen Institute
The Aspen Institute is a global nonprofit founded in 1949 that works toward a free, just, and equitable society through dialogue, leadership, and action on challenges facing the United States and the world.
Art Is Moving From Amenity to Measurable Health Intervention
At Aspen Ideas: Health, Jeremy Faust, Jane Golden, Tiffany Ortiz, and David Leventhal made the case that art is increasingly being treated as a health intervention rather than a cultural amenity. Drawing on mural-making in behavioral health, lullaby-writing for stressed parents, and dance for people with Parkinson’s, they argued that artistic practice can change movement, bonding, stress regulation, identity, and community ownership. The discussion also turned on evidence: how to measure these effects rigorously enough for clinicians, insurers, funders, and public systems without reducing the work to a simple dose or stripping it of meaning.
GLP-1s Are Reshaping Consumer Spending and Employer Health Benefits
A panel at Aspen Ideas: Health argued that GLP-1 drugs are becoming an economic force well beyond pharmaceuticals, changing what households buy while forcing employers, insurers, public programs, pharmacy benefit managers and manufacturers to rethink access to expensive chronic-care medicines. PwC’s Ali Furman pointed to spending shifts in groceries, restaurants, apparel and travel; Eli Lilly’s Laura Steele described new direct-to-consumer and employer channels built around demand; and economist Kosali Simon cautioned that the benefits may not show up simply as lower medical costs.
Open-Ended Play Depends on Constraints, Not Unlimited Freedom
Toy designer Cas Holman argues that play is not a break from serious work but a designed condition for learning, collaboration, and problem-solving. In an Aspen Ideas: Health workshop built around her Rigamajig construction system, Holman makes the case for open-ended play: environments with enough constraint to prompt action and enough ambiguity to let children and adults discover what they are making, rather than execute a prescribed outcome.
Communal Singing Reframes Illness as a Shared Practice of Care
At Aspen Ideas: Health, emergency physician and musician Jeremy Faust joined Patrick and Daniel Lazour to make the case behind their cancer musical Night Side Songs: communal singing can turn private illness into shared care. The Lazours argue that patients, caregivers, and clinicians do not need forced optimism or perfect language so much as practices that help them remain present with one another through treatment, grief, remission, and ordinary life.
Politicized Science Policy Threatens America’s Biomedical Research Ecosystem
Former NIH director Elias Zerhouni argues in Disease Knows No Politics that American biomedical strength depends on a political compact now under strain: science can survive political fights only if evidence, peer review, civil-service independence, immigrant talent, and patient trust remain protected. Drawing on his path from Algeria to Johns Hopkins and the NIH, he warns that separate decisions on funding, universities, immigration, drug pricing, and grant rules can combine to weaken the research system that made the United States a biomedical leader.
Supreme Court Health Cases Test Agency Power, State Law, and Citizenship
At an Aspen Ideas: Health panel, Supreme Court advocates Kannon Shanmugam and Jeffrey Fisher, with moderator Margot Sanger-Katz, argued that some of the term’s most consequential health effects are emerging from cases not formally about health care. Disputes over mifepristone, Roundup labels, conversion therapy, birthright citizenship and gun restrictions show the court reallocating power among presidents, agencies, states, juries, doctors and Congress. Their through-line was institutional: when elected branches leave major health questions unresolved, courts increasingly decide who has authority to set the rules.
Brain Health Care Is Moving From Late-Stage Treatment to Early Prevention
At Aspen Ideas: Health, Arianna Huffington, preventive neurologist Richard Isaacson and Bristol Myers Squibb executive Wendy Bartie argued that brain health should be treated as a lifelong continuum, not a late-life dementia problem or a separate mental-health category. Their case was that earlier risk detection, specific daily interventions such as sleep, exercise and nutrition, new medicines, and less fragmented systems of care need to work together. Bartie put the access test bluntly: innovation matters only if people can actually reach it.
Health Care’s Climate Push Moves From Pledges to Accountability
National Academy of Medicine president Victor Dzau and pediatrician Lisa Patel argue that health care’s climate responsibility extends beyond greener buildings to the disease burden, supply chains, procurement, care delivery and community resilience that determine the sector’s footprint. In this Aspen Ideas: Health discussion, they frame climate change as both a growing source of illness and a test of whether hospitals, clinicians and suppliers can make emissions accountability as routine as patient safety.
Healthcare Cases Test Who Controls Agencies, States, Juries, and Courts
At Aspen Ideas: Health, Supreme Court litigators Kannon Shanmugam and Jeffrey Fisher argued that major healthcare disputes before the courts are also fights over institutional authority. In cases involving mifepristone, Roundup, conversion therapy, marijuana and firearms, birthright citizenship, disability services, and vaccine mandates, they framed the central question as who gets the final say when health policy reaches judges: agencies, states, juries, Congress, the president, or the Court itself.
A Serious Longevity Agenda Requires Habits, Social Ties, and System Reform
Bioethicist Ezekiel Emanuel argues that longevity should not mean trying to live as long as possible, but extending healthy, cognitively intact years with evidence-backed habits and fewer illusions about control over aging. In a conversation with Celine Gounder, he separates useful practices — social connection, exercise, sleep, cooking, vaccines and moderation — from wellness products and “maxing” strategies he says lack data. He also argues that individual discipline is not enough without changes to food policy, social infrastructure, indoor air and the fragmented U.S. health system.
Political Control, Not Flat Budgets, Threatens U.S. Science Funding
At a New York post-screening panel for The Endless Frontier, filmmaker Marilyn Ness, immunologist Shruti Naik, journalist Ira Flatow and executive producer Aaron Mertz argued that the most vulnerable part of science is not discovery itself but the public system that sustains it. Their case was that curiosity-driven research, expert peer review and stable federal funding are being misunderstood and politically threatened just as the public needs a clearer view of how science actually produces medicines, technologies and trained researchers. The panel framed science funding as both an institutional question and a democratic one: who decides what research is worth doing, and whether voters understand enough to defend that process.
AI’s Creative Promise Is Moving People From Consumption to Authorship
In a closing reflection at Shared Futures: The AI Forum, Patrick J. McGovern Foundation president Vilas Dhar argued that AI’s creative significance should be judged less by what machines can produce than by whether they help people recover agency as makers. Drawing on performances from the forum and a childhood memory of communal singing in India, Dhar framed the risk as passivity: a culture in which creativity is professionalized, distributed and consumed rather than shared. His cautious optimism was that AI could widen participation if it gives people without technical skills new ways to write, sing, build and imagine.
AI Distrust Makes Human Agency the Central Cultural Question
Opening Shared Futures: The AI Forum, Vivian Schiller of Aspen Digital and Vilas Dhar of the Patrick J. McGovern Foundation argued that public distrust of AI is not an obstacle to the conversation but its starting point. Schiller framed AI as a contested tool that can either feel imposed on people or be used by artists and makers with agency; Dhar said the deeper issue is not the technology itself, but how people turn fear of replacement into meaning, art, and shared experience.
Eleven Collaborations Win $4.5 Million for Community Trust-Building
The Alliance for Social Trust and Allstate present the 2026 Trust in Practice Awards as an effort to fund and publicize trust-building as a practical discipline, not a civic sentiment. Tom Wilson says the awards are meant to show how trust can be designed into community engagement, while awardees describe that work as listening before acting, relying on local knowledge, building culturally accessible relationships, and sustaining repeated acts of connection under real community conditions.
Trust-Building Was Framed as Funded, Measurable Community Work
The 2026 Trust in Practice Summit highlights present trust-building as practical civic work that needs funding, tools, measurement, and local leadership, not simply a sentiment to be restored. Hosted in Chicago by the Alliance for Social Trust in partnership with Allstate, the summit convened more than 250 leaders and announced $1 million, $500,000, and $100,000 awards to 11 nonprofit collaborations across 10 states. Speakers argued that institutions should support community leaders, measure trust at a local level, and focus on the ordinary problem-solving through which trust is built.
AI Works Best When Domain Experts Control Its Use
Josh Tyrangiel’s AI for Good argues that artificial intelligence is most useful when domain experts, not technology companies or models themselves, decide how it is applied. In conversation with Aspen Economic Strategy Group director Melissa S. Kearney, Tyrangiel says his reporting found real gains in healthcare, education, government, and recycling, but mostly as incremental improvements shaped by doctors, teachers, public servants, and other practitioners. His case is not that AI’s risks are overstated, but that the policy question is how to preserve human authority while regulating the most dangerous capabilities.
Richwood Model Brings Post-Flood Volunteerism to 18 Appalachian Communities
Heather Foster and Katie Loudin of the West Virginia Community Development Hub argue that flood recovery in Appalachia should be treated as a chance to build lasting civic capacity, not only to repair damage. Drawing on the Hub’s work in Richwood, West Virginia, and a new Trust in Practice project across 18 flood-impacted communities, they make the case that post-disaster volunteerism can become durable local leadership when residents are supported to set priorities, deliver visible wins, and keep working together after outside relief groups leave.
Parity Homes Proved West Baltimore Demand Before Capital Arrived
Bree Jones, founder and chief executive of Parity Homes, used her Trust in Practice Summit keynote to argue that trust can operate as development infrastructure in neighborhoods damaged by disinvestment. In her account, Parity proved demand in West Baltimore before major capital arrived by using a $100 rendering, repeated conversations and an 800-person waitlist, then turned that social trust into a resident-led housing effort. Jones’s broader claim is that restoring vacant homes in historically Black neighborhoods requires rebuilding residents’ relationships to land, to one another and to collective power.
KABOOM! Tests Playgrounds as Civic Trust Infrastructure in Uvalde
KABOOM! chief executive Lysa Ratliff used a Trust in Practice Summit awardee spotlight to argue that playgrounds can be more than a post-crisis gesture in Uvalde, Texas. She said the organization’s work after the Robb Elementary shooting shifted from building a single playspace to addressing a citywide access gap, with trust built through repeated presence and community-designed projects. Ratliff’s central claim is that joy can be productive: a measurable source of belonging, connection and problem-solving capacity, if KABOOM! and its research partners can prove the effect.
Social Trust Requires People to Extend Trust Before Expecting It
Olajumoke “Jummy” Banjo, senior director of the Alliance for Social Trust at the Aspen Institute, closed the 2026 Trust in Practice Summit by arguing that social trust begins with people willing to extend it before they can expect it in return. In conversation with NPR’s Jenn White, Banjo framed trust-building as long-term, community-embedded work: less a matter of formal programming than of vulnerability, sustained relationships, and commitments whose benefits may not be visible for decades.
Community Relationships, Not Authority, Rebuild Social Trust
Frederick Riley, executive director of Weave: The Social Fabric Project, told the Trust in Practice Summit in Chicago that America’s trust problem is rooted less in disagreement than in the loss of relationships that once contained it. He argued that trust is rebuilt locally, through neighbors, mentors, coaches, business owners, and other “weavers” who create repeated contact and reasons for people to show up for one another. Programs and data can help, Riley said, but they cannot substitute for the relationships through which trust is formed.
Institutional Trust Is Collapsing, but Neighborhood Networks Remain Durable
At the 2026 Trust in Practice Summit, researchers and community leaders argued that America’s trust crisis looks different depending on where it is measured. Justin Blake of the Edelman Trust Institute and Wendy Weiser of the Brennan Center described deep distrust in institutions, elections, and people outside one’s own information circles, while Lydia Prado of Lifespan Local and Frederick Riley of Weave pointed to neighborhoods where trust is still built through proximity, reciprocity, and repair. The panel’s shared case was that local trust is not enough to counter national forces driving division, but democratic renewal is unlikely without it.
Trust-Building Awards Draw $800 Million in Requests for $5 Million Pool
Allstate chief executive Tom Wilson used the 2026 Trust in Practice Summit in Chicago to argue that social trust should be treated as civic infrastructure that can be deliberately built, not as a vague cultural sentiment in decline. Announcing the inaugural Trust in Practice Awardees, Wilson said more than 1,600 proposals sought $800mn from a $5mn pool, evidence that community organizations are already trying to repair trust at scale but lack resources. The awards, he said, are intended to support and learn from local efforts that build trust through repeated action, shared purpose and relationships.
Trust-Building Is Cast as a Practice Learned Through Community Action
Vivian Schiller and Dan Porterfield opened the 2026 Trust in Practice Summit by framing social trust as work to be learned from practitioners, not simply a theme for discussion. Schiller described the Chicago gathering as a convening built around participation and exchange, while Porterfield tied the effort to the Aspen Institute’s postwar tradition of using dialogue to build understanding and spur action. Their central case was that Aspen and Allstate can help connect communities already rebuilding trust into a broader learning network.