Orply.

Andrew Roberts

Andrew Roberts is a British historian, author, member of the UK House of Lords as Lord Roberts of Belgravia, and a distinguished visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution, where he hosts the podcast “Secrets of Statecraft with Andrew Roberts.”

Churchill’s 1940 Decision Shows How Leaders Can Redirect History

Historian Andrew Roberts argues that broad economic and social forces set the conditions of history, but individual leaders can still determine its course in moments of crisis. In conversation with Peter Robinson, he presents Winston Churchill’s decision to fight on in 1940 as the clearest case, defends Churchill against recent accusations over war and empire, and contends that historical judgment depends on chronology, intent and close reading rather than political mythmaking.

Hoover InstitutionSep 9, 202614 min read

Churchill’s 1940 Decision Shows How Leaders Still Shape History

Historian Andrew Roberts argues that Winston Churchill’s decision to keep Britain fighting in 1940 demonstrates why individual judgment can still redirect history, even amid the constraints of geography, economics and public opinion. In conversation with Peter Robinson, Roberts defends Churchill against charges ranging from racism to responsibility for the Bengal famine, while arguing that Churchill understood Nazism’s character more clearly than contemporaries willing to seek accommodation. His broader case is that, as wartime memory recedes, serious study of leaders’ choices is necessary to understand statecraft.

Hoover InstitutionSep 8, 202614 min read

Britain’s Wartime Diplomats Turned Declining Power Into Lasting Influence

Lord Peter Ricketts, former head of Britain’s Diplomatic Service, argues that the wartime Foreign Office was not a ceremonial adjunct to military power but an instrument for sustaining alliances, securing access and preparing the political order after victory. Unable to match American or Soviet scale, Britain used diplomats to keep de Gaulle aligned, hold Spain outside the Axis, support governments in exile and build the institutions through which it could retain influence after 1945. Ricketts also contends that this work exposed the costs of the service’s narrow recruitment and exclusion of women.

Hoover InstitutionAug 12, 202615 min read

Political Systems Fail When They Cannot Absorb Pressure

Conrad Black argues that political systems and empires endure not through concentrated power alone but through their ability to absorb pressure, accommodate opposition, and weigh the long-term consequences of statecraft. In his account, France’s pre-revolutionary order and the autocracies of 1914 failed because rulers lacked meaningful checks on their judgment, while parliamentary governments were better equipped to recognize the costs of war. Black also contends that settlements designed to defeat an immediate enemy—from Napoleon onward—can create more dangerous strategic problems in their wake.

Hoover InstitutionJul 27, 202612 min read

Communications Has Become Part of How Political Power Is Exercised

David Yelland, the former Sun editor turned communications adviser, argues that public relations has become part of the machinery of power rather than a layer applied after decisions are made. In conversation with Andrew Roberts, he says the collapse of mass tabloid influence, the rise of financial media and digital platforms, and the speed of modern politics have made communication central to how governments, companies, monarchies, and foreign states exercise authority. His recurring test is whether the principal is credible enough to lead that process, because even the strongest advisers cannot rescue a leader the public does not believe.

Hoover InstitutionJul 7, 202623 min read

Britain’s Race Debate Is Importing the Wrong American History

In a Hoover Institution conversation with Andrew Roberts, author and columnist Tomiwa Owolade argues that Britain’s race debate has become distorted by American categories that do not fit British history or demography. Owolade’s case in This Is Not America is not that Britain lacks racism, but that treating black Britons, American descendants of slavery, immigrants, Jews, Muslims, and other groups through a single imported racial framework produces bad analysis and weaker civic life.

Hoover InstitutionJun 16, 202614 min read

Elizabeth II Turned Royal Restraint Into Diplomatic Power

Royal biographer Hugo Vickers argues that Elizabeth II’s statecraft rested on restraint: saying little, appearing above politics, and using ceremony to create room for ministers and officials to act. In this Secrets of Statecraft conversation with Andrew Roberts, Vickers extends that argument to King Charles III, casting monarchy’s diplomatic value as the ability to open doors without seeming to negotiate policy. His account presents the Crown not as an alternative government, but as a constitutional instrument whose power depends on discipline, ambiguity, and the public weight of duty.

Hoover InstitutionJun 3, 202624 min read

Renoir’s Cahen d’Anvers Portraits Became a Record of French Anti-Semitism

Catherine Ostler tells Andrew Roberts that the Dreyfus affair was not an isolated miscarriage of justice but the eruption of a France already “soaked in anti-Semitism.” Using the Cahen d’Anvers sisters, painted by Renoir as children and later scattered by conversion, war and deportation, she links the military frame-up of Alfred Dreyfus to the social world that first admitted wealthy Jewish families and then turned on them. The paintings, in her account, survive as evidence of both Belle Époque assimilation and the limits of that acceptance.

Hoover InstitutionMay 19, 202616 min read

Free-Market Politics Must Be Rebuilt From First Principles

Daniel Hannan, the new director of the Institute of Economic Affairs, argues that Britain’s problem is not just bad policy but a lost understanding of the case for markets, trade and limited government. In a Hoover Institution conversation with Andrew Roberts, Hannan says free-market ideas must be rebuilt from first principles, especially among younger voters, because their core claims are counter-intuitive and no longer carried by political habit. His wider case links economic illiteracy to protectionism, legal and bureaucratic overreach, culture-war imports and a politics that denies scarcity and trade-offs.

Hoover InstitutionMay 8, 202622 min read