Andrew Roberts
Andrew Roberts is a British historian, author, member of the UK House of Lords as Lord Roberts of Belgravia, and a distinguished visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution, where he hosts the podcast “Secrets of Statecraft with Andrew Roberts.”
The Midterm Defeat Rejected Trump Without Giving Democrats a Mandate
Jonah Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Dispatch, argues that the Republicans’ midterm defeat was a sharp repudiation of Donald Trump, not a settled mandate for Democrats. He sees the result as evidence of a volatile electorate that can punish the party in power without permanently switching allegiance. Goldberg also warns that both parties risk misreading such victories when they mistake rejection of their opponents for durable support of their own programs.
Nuremberg’s Forgotten Women Helped Build the Case Against Nazi Crimes
Historian Natalie Livingstone argues that women helped shape the Nuremberg trials but were largely written out of their familiar history. In her book *The Nuremberg Women*, she traces the work and experiences of eight women, from lawyer Harriet Zetterberg, whose case against a Nazi official was presented by a male colleague, to French Resistance survivor Marie-Claude Vaillant-Couturier, whose testimony brought the camps’ atrocities before the court. Livingstone says their stories illuminate both the limits placed on women’s authority and the trials’ insistence on evidence and truth.
Political Costs Keep Broad Agreement on Healthcare Reform From Becoming Action
Lanhee Chen argues that policy problems can be easier to identify than to turn into politically viable reforms. Drawing on his campaign for California State Controller and his work on Mitt Romney’s 2012 campaign, the Hoover Institution fellow says politicians often avoid healthcare changes they consider necessary because they fear the political cost, while market-oriented alternatives take longer to explain than simpler promises of government control. His account points to a recurring gap between proposals Chen considers workable and politicians’ willingness to explain them to voters.
Roberts Argues National Confidence Requires Remembering Both Wrongs and Achievements
Historian Andrew Roberts argues that Britain’s declining pride in its history reflects a public account of the past that emphasizes the British Empire’s abuses while giving too little weight to achievements such as the abolition of slavery. He says that imbalance weakens national confidence by making it harder for people to feel pride in the country’s future. Roberts draws a parallel with the removal of a statue of Thomas Jefferson, arguing that acknowledging historical wrongdoing need not erase other achievements worth remembering.
Napoleon and Churchill Built Command Through Study and Conviction
Historian Andrew Roberts argues that Napoleon and Winston Churchill’s capacity for command was built through military education, historical study and the confidence to act under pressure. He describes their sense of purpose as a “holy fire”: not religious faith, but a conviction that their actions were good, right and necessary, even when command carried a human cost.
Thucydides’ Famous Maxims Lose Meaning When Read Outside Their Context
Historian Andrew Novo argues that Thucydides is most useful to readers of politics and war when his famous lines are read in context, not treated as timeless rules. In a discussion with Andrew Roberts, Novo says the history of Athens and Sparta offers lessons about recurring motives such as fear, ambition and the pursuit of power—but applying them to current rivalries requires attention to specific interests, alliances and decisions.
Churchill’s 1940 Decision Shows How Leaders Can Redirect History
Historian Andrew Roberts argues that broad economic and social forces set the conditions of history, but individual leaders can still determine its course in moments of crisis. In conversation with Peter Robinson, he presents Winston Churchill’s decision to fight on in 1940 as the clearest case, defends Churchill against recent accusations over war and empire, and contends that historical judgment depends on chronology, intent and close reading rather than political mythmaking.
Churchill’s 1940 Decision Shows How Leaders Still Shape History
Historian Andrew Roberts argues that Winston Churchill’s decision to keep Britain fighting in 1940 demonstrates why individual judgment can still redirect history, even amid the constraints of geography, economics and public opinion. In conversation with Peter Robinson, Roberts defends Churchill against charges ranging from racism to responsibility for the Bengal famine, while arguing that Churchill understood Nazism’s character more clearly than contemporaries willing to seek accommodation. His broader case is that, as wartime memory recedes, serious study of leaders’ choices is necessary to understand statecraft.
Britain’s Wartime Diplomats Turned Declining Power Into Lasting Influence
Lord Peter Ricketts, former head of Britain’s Diplomatic Service, argues that the wartime Foreign Office was not a ceremonial adjunct to military power but an instrument for sustaining alliances, securing access and preparing the political order after victory. Unable to match American or Soviet scale, Britain used diplomats to keep de Gaulle aligned, hold Spain outside the Axis, support governments in exile and build the institutions through which it could retain influence after 1945. Ricketts also contends that this work exposed the costs of the service’s narrow recruitment and exclusion of women.
Political Systems Fail When They Cannot Absorb Pressure
Conrad Black argues that political systems and empires endure not through concentrated power alone but through their ability to absorb pressure, accommodate opposition, and weigh the long-term consequences of statecraft. In his account, France’s pre-revolutionary order and the autocracies of 1914 failed because rulers lacked meaningful checks on their judgment, while parliamentary governments were better equipped to recognize the costs of war. Black also contends that settlements designed to defeat an immediate enemy—from Napoleon onward—can create more dangerous strategic problems in their wake.
Communications Has Become Part of How Political Power Is Exercised
David Yelland, the former Sun editor turned communications adviser, argues that public relations has become part of the machinery of power rather than a layer applied after decisions are made. In conversation with Andrew Roberts, he says the collapse of mass tabloid influence, the rise of financial media and digital platforms, and the speed of modern politics have made communication central to how governments, companies, monarchies, and foreign states exercise authority. His recurring test is whether the principal is credible enough to lead that process, because even the strongest advisers cannot rescue a leader the public does not believe.
Britain’s Race Debate Is Importing the Wrong American History
In a Hoover Institution conversation with Andrew Roberts, author and columnist Tomiwa Owolade argues that Britain’s race debate has become distorted by American categories that do not fit British history or demography. Owolade’s case in This Is Not America is not that Britain lacks racism, but that treating black Britons, American descendants of slavery, immigrants, Jews, Muslims, and other groups through a single imported racial framework produces bad analysis and weaker civic life.
Elizabeth II Turned Royal Restraint Into Diplomatic Power
Royal biographer Hugo Vickers argues that Elizabeth II’s statecraft rested on restraint: saying little, appearing above politics, and using ceremony to create room for ministers and officials to act. In this Secrets of Statecraft conversation with Andrew Roberts, Vickers extends that argument to King Charles III, casting monarchy’s diplomatic value as the ability to open doors without seeming to negotiate policy. His account presents the Crown not as an alternative government, but as a constitutional instrument whose power depends on discipline, ambiguity, and the public weight of duty.
Renoir’s Cahen d’Anvers Portraits Became a Record of French Anti-Semitism
Catherine Ostler tells Andrew Roberts that the Dreyfus affair was not an isolated miscarriage of justice but the eruption of a France already “soaked in anti-Semitism.” Using the Cahen d’Anvers sisters, painted by Renoir as children and later scattered by conversion, war and deportation, she links the military frame-up of Alfred Dreyfus to the social world that first admitted wealthy Jewish families and then turned on them. The paintings, in her account, survive as evidence of both Belle Époque assimilation and the limits of that acceptance.
Free-Market Politics Must Be Rebuilt From First Principles
Daniel Hannan, the new director of the Institute of Economic Affairs, argues that Britain’s problem is not just bad policy but a lost understanding of the case for markets, trade and limited government. In a Hoover Institution conversation with Andrew Roberts, Hannan says free-market ideas must be rebuilt from first principles, especially among younger voters, because their core claims are counter-intuitive and no longer carried by political habit. His wider case links economic illiteracy to protectionism, legal and bureaucratic overreach, culture-war imports and a politics that denies scarcity and trade-offs.