Tom Farrey
Founder and executive director of the Aspen Institute’s Sports & Society Program, where he convenes leaders and develops initiatives—including Project Play and Why We Play—to help sport serve the public interest. He is a former ESPN journalist and author of Game On.
Sport Does Not Just Reflect Society; It Helps Shape It
Tom Farrey of the Aspen Institute and LACMA curator Britt Salvesen argue that sport and art are not separate cultural pursuits but ways of seeing how power, belonging and freedom operate in society. Farrey contends that sport has helped shape social change rather than merely reflecting it, while Salvesen says art makes the bodies, communities and emotions behind sport visible. Their Why We Play project asks what games and their representations reveal about the conditions in which people play, watch and belong.
Sport’s Power Depends on Credible Rules, Access, and Responsibility
At the Rose Bowl Institute’s Sportsmanship Summit, Aspen Institute leaders and sports executives argued that sport shapes power not automatically but through the rules, access and relationships institutions build around competition. Dan Reed of the Aspen Institute said leagues depend on legitimate governance and fair enforcement, while Scarlen Martinez argued that athletes and other sports figures must recognize the influence their platforms give them. Across examples from women’s and para sport to the Los Angeles Chargers’ work in Greece, the panel made the case that sport’s civic value rests on how people choose to use that influence.
Sport’s Social Value Depends on Access, Agency, and Power
Sports sociologist Jay Coakley argues that sport does not automatically create belonging, democratic participation or freedom; its effects depend on who gets access, who holds authority and how much control players retain. In a conversation with Aspen Institute Sports & Society Program executive director Tom Farrey, Coakley says commercialized elite sport can narrow participation, normalize top-down power and constrain athlete expression, while informal play offers more room for adaptation and agency. If sport is to connect people across differences, he argues, institutions must deliberately organize for it.
Early Setbacks Are Not a Verdict on a Child’s Future
Michael Lewis argues that youth sport is most valuable not as a route to achievement but as a setting where children learn that failure is real without being final. Speaking with Aspen Institute Sports & Society Program founder Tom Farrey, Lewis says parents’ anxiety about early setbacks can lead them to obstruct coaches and teachers in an effort to protect children from ordinary difficulty. His practical prescription is to educate parents when children are young, before every loss or selection decision is treated as a judgment on a child’s future.
Belonging in Sport Requires Shared Authority, Not Just Access
At an Aspen Institute roundtable on sport and belonging, sociologist Jay Coakley argued that inclusion requires more than being welcomed: people must be seen, valued and included in decision-making. Participants including Binta Brown, Brandon Bailey, Ezra Frech and Sue Enquist made related cases for sport as a route to agency, representation and social change, while warning that access without shared authority or institutional accountability leaves belonging incomplete.
Soccer’s Democratic Promise Depends on Who Gets to Play
At an Aspen Ideas Festival session tied to the Aspen Institute and LACMA’s “Why We Play” project, Tom Farrey framed soccer as civic infrastructure: a game that can shape identity, trust, diplomacy, gender opportunity and economic life. Carolyn Blodgett, Betsey Stevenson and Glenn Kaino extended the case, arguing that those benefits do not flow from soccer automatically. They depend on the institutions around the game — schools, fields, transport, Title IX, team culture and affordability — and can disappear when access is captured by families able to pay for it.
Youth Sports Safety Reform Needs National Standards and Dedicated Funding
At Project Play Summit 2026, Benita Fitzgerald-Mosley of the U.S. Center for SafeSport and Seth Lieberman of Ankored argued that youth sports safety has become a governance problem as much as a cultural one. Parents increasingly expect background checks, abuse-prevention training and injury safeguards, but the speakers said today’s system is fragmented, underfunded and outside SafeSport’s reach for much of grassroots sport. The reform case is for common standards, portable credentials, dedicated funding and a stronger central safety infrastructure by 2028.
Youth Sport Reform Is Shifting From Programs to Children’s Rights Standards
Tom Farrey of the Aspen Institute, USA Volleyball chair Cassidy Lichtman, and Deloitte’s Mariam Mansury argue that U.S. youth sport needs new defaults, not just new programs. Using Norway’s child-first sport system, USA Volleyball’s development work, and city adoption of the Children’s Bill of Rights in Sports, they make the case for treating youth sport as an ecosystem governed by minimum standards around access, safety, coaching quality, developmentally appropriate play, and joy.
A $40 Billion Youth Sports Market Lacks Basic Child Safeguards
Tom Farrey of the Aspen Institute’s Sports & Society Program argues that youth sports need a basic governance layer if they are to deliver on their civic and developmental promise. In a conversation moderated by Chuck Todd, Farrey makes the case for registration, safety standards, abuse reporting, school-based support and a children’s rights framework, while Todd frames youth sports as one of the few remaining local institutions that still brings divided communities together. Their shared premise is that more participation is not enough if the system remains privatized, fragmented and weakly accountable.
Cost, Transit, and Field Shortages Limit Youth Soccer Access
A new Aspen Institute Sports & Society Program report on youth soccer in New York and New Jersey, discussed by Tom Farrey and philanthropist Laurie Tisch, argues that the region’s central problem is not children’s interest in the game but unequal access to it. Farrey said the report points to cost, transportation, field shortages and gender gaps as the barriers shaping who gets to play, while Tisch said the findings give her philanthropy a roadmap for a $10mn push into local soccer programs, fields and support for girls’ participation.