Political Control, Not Flat Budgets, Threatens U.S. Science Funding
At a New York post-screening panel for The Endless Frontier, filmmaker Marilyn Ness, immunologist Shruti Naik, journalist Ira Flatow and executive producer Aaron Mertz argued that the most vulnerable part of science is not discovery itself but the public system that sustains it. Their case was that curiosity-driven research, expert peer review and stable federal funding are being misunderstood and politically threatened just as the public needs a clearer view of how science actually produces medicines, technologies and trained researchers. The panel framed science funding as both an institutional question and a democratic one: who decides what research is worth doing, and whether voters understand enough to defend that process.
The Aspen Institute·Jun 22, 2026·17 min read
