Jason Hicks
Economist and limited term faculty member in the University of Victoria Department of Economics whose research focuses on public policy, labour economics, occupational regulation, and the labour-market effects and political economy of occupational licensing.
Occupational Licensing Rules Need Evidence on Quality, Access, and Costs
Kyle Rozema framed occupational licensing as a trade-off between public protection and restricted access to work and services, and the panelists applied that test across law, medicine, economics, apprenticeships, screening, and discipline. Jason Hicks, Alicia Plemmons, and Yun Taek Oh largely defended licensing where it plausibly controls quality, but argued that many existing requirements — from portability barriers and recurring exams to opaque character reviews and public discipline — need narrower justification, better evidence, and more transparent design.
Occupational Licensing Reform Targets Boards, Degree Requirements, and Speech Restrictions
At a Hoover Institution symposium chaired by Dan Sullivan of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Daniel Graulich, Lisa Knepper and Peter Blair argued that occupational licensing reform is increasingly about who controls the boundaries of work. Graulich framed licensing boards as a competition problem when market participants regulate their rivals; Knepper described litigation over boards’ efforts to absorb speech, advice and new services into licensed occupations; and Blair argued that bachelor’s-degree requirements can restrict labor-market access in much the same way as licenses.