The tech industry's bible for launching new products didn't start as a book, but as a story. This is the story of Geoffrey Moore and how his powerful framework for 'Crossing the Chasm' gave a generation of entrepreneurs a shared language to navigate the perilous journey from early adopters to the mainstream market. It’s a masterclass in how a single, powerful idea can shape an entire industry.
Before the book, before the consulting empire, before his name became a verb in Silicon Valley boardrooms—"we need to Moore this thing"—Geoffrey Moore was a man of letters. He held a Ph.D. in Renaissance literature, his days spent deconstructing 16th-century poetry, a world of heroic couplets and pastoral ideals a universe away from the hum of cooling fans and the relentless churn of venture capital. In the late 1970s, he was an English professor at a small college in Michigan. But a family need to be closer to home pulled him and his wife back to California, and in doing so, pulled a pin on his academic career. There were no professorships waiting for him in the Bay Area. So, he did what many a bright, adrift mind did in that time and place: he fell into tech. He started as a corporate trainer, then moved into sales, then marketing, for a series of software companies he would later describe as “undistinguished.” He was, by his own admission, not a natural. He wasn’t a gifted salesperson or a born manager. It was a decade of trying on ill-fitting clothes. But he was watching. He was a scholar, trained to see the underlying structure, the narrative arc, in a mess of human activity. And Silicon Valley in the 1980s was a glorious, chaotic mess. The real shift came in 1986. Moore, then 40 years old, talked his way into a job at Regis McKenna Inc. This was not just another marketing firm. It was *the* marketing firm for the high-tech industry, the place that had helped launch Apple Computer. Regis McKenna was the maestro of the new economy, a svengali who understood that a microchip wasn't just a piece of silicon; it was a story. And at McKenna’s firm, Moore, the literature Ph.D., finally found his calling. Surrounded by the brightest, most ambitious companies of the era, he wasn't just selling products anymore. He was analyzing the plot.
At Regis McKenna, the new world of technology paraded through the conference rooms. Companies arrived flush with cash and revolutionary ideas, convinced they were about to change everything. And some of them did. But Moore began to notice a disturbing, repeating pattern. A company would launch a brilliant piece of technology. The tech press would adore it. Enthusiasts and early adopters—the geeks and the visionaries—would line up to buy it, proclaiming it the future. The sales charts would rocket up, a beautiful, near-vertical line of success. And then, just as the company prepared for mass-market domination, the line would mysteriously flatten. Or worse, it would fall off a cliff. Millions of dollars in venture capital, endless media hype, and a product that actually worked—none of it seemed to matter. Moore saw it happen again and again. These companies weren't failing because their products were bad. They were failing because the story they were telling, the one that had so captivated the early believers, was the wrong story for everyone else. He saw the wreckage piling up. Consider the pen-based computers of the early 1990s: Go Corporation, Momenta, EO. These were handheld devices that promised to let you write directly on a screen. The vision was intoxicating. They were the darlings of the tech world, celebrated on magazine covers. But they never found a mainstream audience. They were solutions to a problem most people didn't know they had, sold on the promise of a future that was still too abstract. They were all sizzle and no steak for the pragmatic customer who just wanted to get a job done. The technology was there, but it fell into a void. Inside Regis McKenna, Moore wasn't the only one seeing this. A pair of consultants at the firm, Lee James and Warren Schirtzinger, were already developing a framework to explain this phenomenon. They were adapting a 1962 sociological model called "Diffusion of Innovations," which mapped how new ideas spread through a population. But James and Schirtzinger noticed something specific to high-tech: a deep, structural gap between the early market and the mainstream. They were the first to name it. They called it “the chasm.”
The idea was electric. It gave a name and a shape to the ghost that haunted Silicon Valley. It explained that the group of customers who buy things first—the Innovators and Early Adopters—are fundamentally different from the next wave of customers, the Early Majority. The first group is buying a change agent, a revolutionary advantage. They’re willing to put up with bugs and missing features for a chance to be part of the future. But the Early Majority, the pragmatists, are not visionaries. They’re buying a productivity improvement. They don't want a revolution; they want a reliable solution to a pressing problem. They want a whole product, complete with support, a user manual, and the reassuring sense that they aren't making a risky bet. The marketing that wins over a visionary is poison to a pragmatist. And in that gap of understanding, companies were dying. They were trying to leap from one side to the other, waving the same banner of revolutionary change, only to plummet into the chasm below. Moore, with his gift for metaphor and narrative clarity, seized on this concept. It was the unified field theory for everything he had been observing. He began to evangelize the idea within the firm, using it in his own consulting work. He was in the process of writing a book, a collection of his thoughts on tech marketing originally titled "High Tech Marketing; Changes in theGame." But when he was introduced to the chasm framework, he knew he had found his central theme. The book project was restructured. It had a new name, a new focus, and a new mission. In 1991, with a foreword by Regis McKenna himself and a modest advance of $10,000, HarperBusiness published *Crossing the Chasm*. The publisher forecasted sales of fewer than 5,000 copies. It was a niche book for a niche industry.
The book did not explode onto the bestseller lists. It spread the way the best technologies do: through a network of true believers. It was passed from one cubicle to another, from a VP of marketing to a CEO, from a startup founder to their venture capitalist. It was a book about a pattern of failure, but what it offered was a glimmer of hope, a strategy for survival. Moore’s great contribution was not just identifying the chasm, but providing a detailed, actionable plan for how to cross it. He laid it out with the precision of a military strategist. You don't just jump. You focus all your resources on a single point of attack. You find a "beachhead," a niche market of pragmatists who have a desperate, undeniable need for your product. You ignore everyone else. You pour all your energy into solving that one specific problem for that one specific group, creating a "whole product" that makes them deliriously happy. You dominate that niche. And only then, once you have a foothold and a chorus of happy references, do you use that base to expand into adjacent markets. It was a message of radical focus in an industry drunk on unfettered expansion. The timing was perfect. The PC revolution was maturing. Companies like IBM were losing their grip as nimbler, more focused competitors emerged. The landscape was littered with the ghosts of companies that had once been the next big thing—Ashton-Tate, Wang, Aldus. Moore’s book arrived like a battlefield manual for the survivors. It gave them a shared language. Suddenly, boardrooms were filled with talk of "bowling alleys" and "tornadoes," of "visionaries" and "pragmatists." The book wasn't just describing the market; it was shaping it. The map was becoming the territory. *Crossing the Chasm* sold over a million copies. It turned the literature Ph.D. into a high-tech guru. But its real legacy is not in the sales figures. It’s in the quiet, profound shift in thinking it created. The book taught a generation of entrepreneurs that the most important thing about a new technology is not what it does, but who it is for. It gave them a story—not a story of inevitable, explosive growth, but a harder, more honest story about a perilous journey, a deep divide, and the focused, disciplined courage required to cross it. It was a story, in the end, about finding your way from a small island of believers to the vast, waiting mainland.